Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-kaliner-show--6946691/support.
Subscribe to the podcast
All the links to Pete's Prep are free!
Get exclusive content here!
Media Bias Check: GroundNews promo code!
Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.com
What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily show prep with all the links, become a patron, go to dpetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your smartphone or tablet, And again, thank you so much for your support. Last hour, we talked about the lawsuit filed by the former UNC Charlotte DEI administrator against UNC Charlotte for firing her. I will circle back to that Jen Pisaki style, but first let me let me circle back like Pasaki would. Actually she never did circle back to this stuff. She just said she would circle back anyway. I'm actually going to go back to something I promised I would talk about a little bit more in depth. I'm gonna do that now, which is the DEI industry, okay, and what this actually is about. And when I say I'm going to talk about it, I actually mean somebody else is going to talk about it. A guy named James Lindsay. He writes over at New discourses dot com and he was one of the guys that did the grievance studies and he's a big warrior against the Wolke left and the woke right. And had him on the program back in September actually the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated, he was on the program. So he had written and this goes back to twenty twenty three. Okay. This is one of the benefits of covering a story for a long period of time is that you you build up the institutional knowledge. By the way, that's why beat reporting is so important. When you just send everybody out in a newsroom for general assignment reporting, you become a shower reporter because and I don't mean like intellectually, I'm just saying you don't. You don't have a deep understanding of a lot of issues or any issue, because you're just constantly running around chasing whatever the story of the day is. You're not on a beat, developing sources, doing the daily grind of learning things. And because a lot of stuff you may learn on a beat, you never put into a story until maybe a couple of years later. So being on a be covering a topic for a long period of time builds you that institutional knowledge. So I've got files on critical race theory, DEI all sorts of stuff back at the house, and I went and pulled out this this script. It comes from June of twenty twenty three, the diversity, equity and inclusion industry under what James Lindsay calls woke Marxism. He says, it's easy to understand this, okay, Equity is a rebrand of socialism, that's all that is. So when you hear the word equity, think socialism, what does that mean? And it's an administered economy that makes outcomes equal. I'm sure you've seen the graphic where it's like three kids looking over a fence into a baseball game. Right, they can't afford tickets, so they can't go. And so you've got a tall kid, a medium heighth kid, and a short kid. The short kid can't see anything, right, the medium kid can barely see over the fence, and the tall kid can see fine. And so they say, you know, equality is giving everybody a box to stand on. So now each of the three kids has a box to stand on, and so equality looks like the tall kid really not needing the box. He's now just standing higher looking over the fence. The medium height kid he can now see over the fence, and the short kids still can't. So they say equity would be the tall kid give up his box to the short kid, so the short kid can now see over the wall, and now all three of them can see. Isn't that nice? Right? But who's doing the redistributing of the boxes? See, there's the key. So in a free society, the tall kid would be free to make the kind choice, which would be to somehow you come into possession of this box and you're like, well, here, I'll let you borrow my box, or I'll give my box to you whatever I can already see. I don't need the box, you have it so you can watch. That's a free choice. Under equity, somebody takes the box from the tall kid and says, you don't need to see it, or you don't need to use the box to see, so we're gonna take it from you. We're gonna give it to the short kid. See. So that's why what Lindsay is saying is equity is a rebrand of socialism. It is an administered economy, whether the economy is you know, the larger economy or the economy is of you know, potential jobs at a UNC campus or something something like that. Right, program or funding that's available to people, it's administered. Somebody is calling the shots. Diversity and inclusion then are the tools used to install political officers and to censor and remove dissidence. Okay, So diversity is the tool to install the people that will carry out the implementation of your equity. And the quote inclusion is actually the opposite, right, it is censorship. It's to kick out anybody that objects. Hey, why are you taking my box? Right? Giving it to somebody else? He says, In other words, the woke Marxist DEI industry is a racket designed to install commissars for its ideology. He says, equity is the goal. What is it? Ery describes it as the rebranding of socialism arias. How do you know this? What is socialism? By definition? If you understand Marxist ideology, and I mean specifically Marxist socialism. If you understand Marxist ideology, you understand that marx believe that capitalism would give into its own contradictions, then the proletariat would rise up seize the means of production, and they would create an administered economy where they redistribute material, resources, opportunity, etc. According to Marxist theory, so in particular, people would be made equal, shares would be adjusted so that people would be made equal. Then this would be done by the proletariat. Equity is the same thing. Social equity is defined by H. George Frederickson as compared against equality, as equality is when citizens A and B are equal, and equity is when shares are adjusted so that citizens A, M. B are made equal. In other words, you're going to have the seizure of the means of a distrib distribution of resources, whether those are material or cultural. They're going to be redistributed to groups, and then within the groups to individuals within those groups. And so you're going to have a redistributed economy where groups are made equal and presumably most individuals within those groups will be equalized by that mechanism. So equity means socialism. The only thing that's different is it's not purely economic. It now takes into account things like racial identity, sexual identity, gender identity, fat status and so on. All these identity politics. Yeah, fat status Okay, So think in terms of Marxism being about capital, right and equity being about social capital. Right, they both have value, they both have currency. Here social capital does you know, carry purchase? And so if you can take some social capital from some group of people, because again remember in Marxism it's all about power dynamics, oppress or repressed viewpoints that everybody is viewed through that lens. You are either oppressed or oppressor. And so if you can, if you can take some social capital from your oppressor right now, because because you are the oppressed, or inversely you could say I'm oppressed, therefore I'm justified in taking that capital from you. He talks about how these decisions then get made, Who gets what, how much do they get? Who decides all of that? All right, Holiday football has arrived. Right With Draft King Sportsbook and Officials sports betting partner of the NFL, the unexpected can turn game day into payday. And don't forget Draft Kings as you're back with early exit. Pretty neat function here. If your player goes down in the first half, you still get paid in cash. Download the Draft Kings Sportsbook app and use the code PETE. That's code pete. New customers can bet five bucks and get two hundred dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins instantly. In partnership with Draft Kings, the Crown is yours. Gambling problem call one eight hundred gambler. In New York call eight seven seven eight hope and why, or text hope and why two four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothill casino and resort Kansas. Pass through of per wager tax may apply in Illinois twenty one plus age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario. Restrictions apply. Bet must win to receive bonus bets, which expire in seven days. Minimum mods required. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG dot co, slash audio limited time offer. So diversity, equity inclusion, I said, equity is the is a rebrand of socialism. It's same thing administered economy that makes outcomes equal. How do you do that? You got to have people that make those decisions. Who gets what? How much do they get a piece, right, and all of those decisions or the economy, if you will, whether it's actual you know, property, actual money, or capital or its social capital, it's credentials, it's standing, its invitations to the hottest parties on the college campus among faculty, that kind of thing, right, Who does the administration of this of this equity, Well, that would be the party, whatever the party is. In a socialist utopia which has never really been tried, that would be you know, the socialist party, communist party. And that's where the diversity and the inclusion parts come into play. Diversity is not diversity meaning looking different or having different backgrounds or different you know, gender, sex, sexuality characteristics. What diversity means is that those characteristics are spoken to in an authentic way, which is defined by the neo Marxist identity theories, whether that's critical race theory, gender theory, queer theory, or whatever else. So you are, actually, under their view, not authentically diverse, because you're not representing your diverse perspective authentically unless you're speaking to it from a position that's adopted the critical theory. The relevant critical theory we see in policy documents all over that diversity doesn't mean hiring for characteristics like sex, gender, race, et cetera. That means hiring for expertise in diversity, and if people happen to be of different sex, gender, et cetera, that's even better expertise and diversity means you've adopted the so called unique, structurally determined voice of color or voice of your identity, and therefore you are actually speaking what the critical theory or the Marxist theory, Marxist identity theory is saying that somebody who looks like you should be saying. Right. So this goes to the argument that you heard from Adam Gillett from Accuracy in Media last hour when he was talking about diversity, and he's like, look at the makeup of the you know, college faculty. It's homogeneous politically, right. There are no conservatives, you know, among the faculty ranks, and the amount of political donations that are given, it's like ninety nine percent for Democrats, right, And that's why a lot of people on the right throw this argument back in the face of the left when they say, you know, oh, we're about diversity, and like, no, you're not, because you want everybody to think like you. And this is what Jane Lindsay is talking about in that clip there is that diversity is essentially a code word that is used to smuggle in the Marxism. Okay, it's a way to weed out who is there simply because they are a member of a protected class, a minority status, or something right but doesn't agree with Marxism. So you're not adequately or authentically diverse unless you are articulating the positions that a Marxist would articulate that would represent your stereotypical class. This is why you get leftists calling conservatives and Republicans who are black or who are gay, they call them sellouts, they call them traders, they call them not authentic. It's the ideology that makes them an authentic member of their demographic group. Right, what's the line, not all skin folk or kinfolk, that kind of That's what they're talking about. That's what this means. That's how you end up with this, with these charges, these accusations, these smears that you're not authentic unless you agree with me. Hence the uh. The diversity is the diversity and inclusion, you know, Diversity is the mechanism by which you administer the economy, and the inclusion is the way that you censor people who are not quote unquote authentic. This is what James Lindsay gets to. Now I think let's try it again. Inclusion means that people who are affected badly by the so called power dynamics have to be made to be included. Everybody else is believed to be automatically included. So ideas that might offend somebody who is in a so called protected class must be excluded to promote an inclusive environment. Idea, pictures, images, rocks, anything in the world that might make somebody feel like they can associate through whatever. Master bedrooms, for example, give people the idea of slavery even though they have nothing to do with slavery. The term was invented in the nineteen twenties. And a catalog, a marketing catalog, and so anything that can give somebody the idea of something that feels like power dynamics has to be censored. And if you aren't awakened or woke to the Marxist analysis of your own race or gender, sexual orientation or whatever, then you're not authentic. So it's the installation of political officers inside the bureaucracy that then administer. These are the diversity officers, right, which they then lead the censorship, the purges. That is the quote unquote inclusion just come with the censorship, even proactively to the mere sight of a white person at a graduation, for example, means segregating people from each other to prevent harm or sharing the space. That's why we saw segregated spaces being promoted as inclusive when they are anything but inclusive. Right, it's like the upside down World. That's not a reference to Stranger That was not intentional. Although the final I guess is it one episode tonight or is it two episodes? Is it two? It's just one they're gonna roll, but it's two hours, right, it's one episode, two hours. Okay, yeah, I'll be watching it. I mean, I've come this far. It took me ten years to watch you know, all four seasons? Is that how many? There were four? This is the fifth season. Yeah, well, I mean they took like about half a decade off between like seasons three and four for some reason, and then they did like a half season season five finale, a half season finale or something. It was ridiculous. They're they're all now in the like midlife years, they're like thirty. They started off but they were all cute. They were like seven years old, and now they're thirty. It's just nuts. Anyway, this is why you end up with colleges, and mainly colleges. I don't know about any high schools that have been doing this, but you know, holding segregated graduation ceremonies, got to do it proactively for inclusiveness. It's the complete opposite. And the party officers, whether that's at the UNC Charlotte Dei office, right, or it's you know, a political party, they get to make the decisions for people. That's the vision of Marx, that's the communist vision. It's the people, but not really the people. It's the people who are in control of the party apparatus. And then sometimes you'll hear the term belonging. The only clue that which is inclusion. But it's with a positive affirmation. So it's not enough to not offend. Right, And by the way, you don't know if you've ever been offensive or not, because if you're not intending to be offensive, but you are offensive, it doesn't matter what your intent is. Intention has nothing to do with it. It's all about how somebody perceives it right. So yeah, that's a dead bang loser. But now with the belonging thing, that means you have to affirm everybody and their ideas. And if you don't do the affirmation, then you're not being inclusive and helping them feel like they belong. It's all about control. You know. Stories are powerful. They help us make sense of things, to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the people of our past while transcending generations. They help us process the meaning of life, and our stories are told through images and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video started in nineteen ninety seven and Minhill, North Carolina. It was the first company to provide this valuable service, converting images, photos and videos into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums. The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will go over all of the details with you to create a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person or mail them. They'll be ready in a week or two. Memorial videos for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories all told through images. That's what your photos and videos are. They are your life told through the eyes of everyone around you and all who came before you, and they will tell others to come. Who you are. Visit creative video dot com. So look, I want to I want to try to, you know, end the year on an upbeat note or a couple notes, maybe like like a whole verse, maybe a whole song of upbeatedness. So I've been talking a lot over the years about, you know, how much I agree with the environmentalists and the net zeroers, the no growthers, the leftists about how we want to get to no carbon emissions because if we don't get to zero carbon emissions, then we're all going to die because guya earth is going to kill us. Although I disagree with that last part. I don't think gaya Earth is going to kill us. I think the sun is trying to kill us, and the sooner we can knock that thing out, I think the better off we're all going to be. But I have look, I am on board. You want to get rid of CO two gas in the atmosphere, You want to starve all the trees and bushes of their the what they breathe in and need to grow. Like, I'm on board, let's kill all the trees and shrubs. I am on board. It'll make the views a lot nicer when you're driving down the road up in the mountains, you know, and like all the trees have now grown so tall you can't see any of the beautiful vistas, although they probably won't be so beautiful if there are no trees in the valleys anymore, but that's side issue, right. Primarily, it's like I can't see all of the beautiful nature because the nature has grown up too high along the side of the road. Which, by the way, if you go up there and you look at some of the old photos go through the local museums as I have done, you'll see that they like when they built all the road system up there, is for mainly like a lot of logging. They clear cut the bajeebus out of the mountains up in western North Carolina. I mean, they just took all the trees, right, and so it took a long time, but all the trees have grown back, and now they've grown up alongside of the roads that they had put in that you used to be able to look out over the side of the road and see these beautiful vistas of the valley and such, but you can't see them anymore because all the trees have grown up, and the environmentalists up in the Asheville area they don't allow you to cut any of the trees down, so now you just can't see over the side, which my wife is happy about, because she gets kind of nervous, you know, looking over the side of the guardrail there and seeing the sheer cliff drop off. So I mean, look, life is trade offs. But anyway, the whole point here is that CO two is is bad. We want to get rid of all the CO two, right, We want to get to net zero. We want to have no carbon emissions, and that's gonna that's going to win the energy race for us. Okay. Now, in all seriousness, if you're ever in a discussion with somebody who is advocating for the reduction of CO two in the atmosphere and nuclear is not part of their equation, then you know you're not actually discussing the topic with a serious person, okay, because nuclear energy production must be part of the equation unless you want us all you know, living by candle light and burning you know, cowfeeces for heat. Like there's there is no future with no CO two without nuclear, Okay, you gotta have nuclear energy production, which is why I was very excited to see this story at the at Business NC dot com, a piece by Ray Groenberg. Duke Energy has asked federal regulators to approve the idea of using part of its Bellus Creek property in Stokes County, North Carolina as the site for a set of small nuclear reactors, or as George W. Bush and Homer Simpson would call it, nuclear nuclear. The utility is, by the way, is it pronounced Bellew's Creek or Belleuze Creek, Bellews, Bellews anyway, it's in Stokes County. The utility on Tuesday applied to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission or the NRC for what's called an early site permit, and that entails the environmental impact studies and site safety factors, so like you know what happens if an earthquake occurs, a hurricane like that kind of stuff. So they've started the ball rolling on what's called the early site permit. Now they're going to need other permits because it is GOV co. You got to have like a bajillion permits for this sort of thing, should it. Should Duke Energy decide that it actually wants to go ahead with the project, then Duke would have to go back to the NRC to get their permits for construction and for operating. Okay, so they still need those permits approved. But the early site review process is optional, and it didn't even exist at the time Duke built its existing fleet of reactors here in the Carolinas, the newest reactor of which went online. Do you know when the when was the last time Duke Energy brought a nuclear plant online in the Carolinas? Give up? Nineteen eighty seven? Nineteen eighty seven. It's been what forty years almost since a nuclear plant went online? Forty years The country's first wave of reactor construction taught the NRC and the industry that many of the challenges that delayed the projects come during the site selection phase. This is according to Chris Nolan, Duke Energy's vice president for New Nuclear Projects or what they call new news. I'm just kidding. I don't think that I would call it that. If I were to Duke in the New Nuclear Projects, I would call it the new Noops Department. That's what I would call it, just for fun because it sounds fun. So by doing the early sit permit and getting the ball rolling now you can get all of the challenges because you know they're gonna get sued. They're gonna be objections by you know, all of the environmentalist groups that want no CO two emissions produced but don't want nuclear rights. It's solar farms, wind power only. That's the only thing that these groups, which by the way, like you can't build a wind farm without fossil fuels. It's just absurd. Like everything about that turbine, all of it comes from everything that comes out of the ground, you know, So don't take my word for it. Listen to Billy Bob Thornton in the documentary Land Man. Okay. Bellu's Creek is currently home to one of Duke's coal fired power plants, which the left hates the coal fire plants, hates them with the coal ash pits and the dirty fuel that it's burning. Right, So you're burning coal and you're polluting everything, and you're killing all of the babies and stuff. So okay, well let's take that offline and let's build let's build nuclear instead. No, no, no, we can't do that. So the utility is looking at land which is just to the east of where the coal plant is located currently, and it believes that the land that it's identified can accommodate up to six small modular reactors or SMRs. And I've talked about these things too. I've been very excited about these things. I have no idea how they work. I'm not a nuclear scientist, but they're small as I understand it, they're smaller than the big ones. I don't know if those are called big reactors, but these are small modular reactors SMRs, and they will generate somewhere in the neighborhood of about three hundred megawatts, which I believe will power a deloreate through through time travel. So if they eat, if each one can generate three hundred megawats, then you get six of them online, you got eighteen hundred megawatts, and I think that's a gigawatt. That's like one point eight gigawatts if my math is correct on all of that, and that's usually what they build. The big ones are the gigawatt producers. So here they're going to build smaller ones, and they don't know what kind of SMRs is, like a bunch of different models that they can use. They haven't decided what model to use, but they don't have to decide that right now. But their long term plan is that by twenty thirty seven, they've got to have an additional six hundred megawatts of new nuclear capacity online. Within twelve years, that's what they need to have, six hundred megawats. So two of these SMRs have to get built, Okay, within the next decade. People, we need two of them. So they got plans for eight and if they get their early site permits approved, those permits are good for twenty years. And they're helping a project in Canada and one in the Tennessee Valley in Knoxville, and so they're going to learn all of the mistakes that get made in those two projects and then they're going to say, all right, let's avoid those mistakes for our project. I think it's a great idea. I am supportive of this effort. Do good job. All right. If you're listening to this show, you know I try to keep up with all sorts of current events, and I know you do too, And you've probably heard me say get your news from multiple sources. Why, Well, because it's how you detect media bias, which is why I've been so impressed with ground News. It's an app, and it's a website and it combines news from around the world in one place so you can compare coverage and verify information. You can check it out at check dot ground, dot news slash pete. I put the link in the podcast description too. I started using ground News a few months ago and more recently chose to work with them as an affiliate because it lets me see clearly how stories get covered and by whom. The blind spot feature shows you which stories get ignored by the left and the right. See for yourself check dot ground, dot news slash pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll get fifteen percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage plan to get unlimited access to every feature. Your subscription then not only helps my podcast, but it also supports ground News as they make the media landscape more transparent. Here's a message on the text line from a random seven oh four number. By the way, if you give us your name in the text, we can put it into the system. You could just give your first name, and then I can say, you know, Pete texts in and says, so this is a seven oh four number. Who says, m leave it cleaner than you found it. That's the way I was raised. Yeah, well, I mean, look, you can't spell conservation without conservetive, can't spell conservative without conserve. It's all like, it's all part of the same thing. I'm the same way. Like I go camping, You pack out what you brought in, right, you burn everything that you can burn. No, I'm kidding, burn all the plastic bottles that you can't at the campfire. No, but you Yeah, you leave it better than you found it. That's the idea. And mister x White says for every lawsuit Duke receives for new nuke construction, they should publicly shut down a coal plant unit until the suit is resolved. Yeah. That well, make everybody pay for the wackos. I don't. I would not support that, mister White, if that is your real name. Another another piece of good news, we have confirmation that if you want more housing, which everybody keeps saying, there's a housing crunch and a crisis, right, and it's too expensive. So if you want, we have more evidence to support this idea that if you want more housing, the solution is is to build more housing. I know it's kind of crazy, but just stay with me here. Okay, it may sound paradoxical at first, counterintuitive even, but rent got cheaper in several major cities this past year thanks to an influx of luxury apartment buildings that opened. I talked a little bit about this a few weeks ago. We have more evidence now, Bloomberg dot com reporting based on numbers that were put out by Costar, which is the real estate research firm. The US average rental rate Okay, the average rental rate across the country fell by zero point one eight percent, so not a lot, but it went down in November, it went down. That is the largest monthly drop in more than fifteen years. Driving the decline lower rents in cities like Austin, Denver, and Phoenix, as well as vacation destinations like Naples, Florida, Myrtile Beach, South Carolina, and Ashville. Now I will put an asterisk by Ashville because I think that had something to do with Eleen. I think a lot of rates dropped because you know, people fled, People were not vacationing there, and so a lot of the rates came down so Ashville. And in fact, if you look at the chart, which I am looking at the chart here, of the amount of new units that came online, Ashville is not on this list. So Ashville doesn't. They tend not to want to build a lot. And I was told last night during my live stream from folks out in western North Carol on the county Bunkham County, they do zoning approvals out there, and they're even worse. They're more restrictive than the city of Asheville is. So people don't want not in my backyard. The Nimbi's or the bananas, build absolutely nothing anywhere, build absolutely nothing anywhere nearby, or something like that. Banana is another acronym for folks that they know. They move out there, and they're like, I got my little slice of heaven, and I'm gonna pull the ladder up behind me so nobody else can come aboard. I know I'm mixing metaphors there, But if you build more housing, you get more housing. And it's almost as if there's some sort of I don't know, invisible hand at work here. It lowers the prices why this doesn't make any sense. You're bringing luxury apartments online, Pete, why would that bring down the prices? Ah? Glad you asked when more luxury apartments get built or Class A apartment stock. When you you build more of those, the people who are in class B that want to move into a nicer unit, a brand new unit, they have the ability to move out of the class B and into Class A, which then opens up Class B. Now the landlord is like, oh, man, I got all these vacancies, So what do they do? They lower the rates on Class B, which then makes them affordable to people who are living in Class C apartments and they want to move up into nicer units, so they move from class C to Class B. So now you've got the landlords in class C and they're like, oh, what do I do? I got all these vacancies. That's right, you can see where this is going. It's kind of like a cyclical thing, right. They lower their rates new building openings or bringing rents down as wealthy tenants trade up, forcing landlords to drop prices for older apartments. Rents for older apartments have fallen as much as eleven percent. Some are now on offer at rates as low as homes that are usually designated as quote unquote affordable but come with restrictions including rent control and rent stabilization. In other words, the government regulatory regime that's meant to make these units quote unquote affordable. They are now more expensive than the class C private domain rentals because those landlords don't want the vacancies, they want people in the homes. The changed I love this line from Bloomberg. The changed dynamic in the rental market is challenging the idea that luxury housing doesn't help the broader ecosystem. Okay, who came up with that stupid idea, because it's really stupid. That's a dumb idea. It's challenging this idea that luxury housing doesn't help the broader ecosystem. Of course it would think about it. When flat screen TVs came out, who could afford flat screens? Not me. I couldn't go out and get like the first run of those things. They were like thousands of dollars. Now you can get a flat screen TV. I mean, if it's anything like the one I bought, it's going to break within the next two years. But like you can go out and buy a flat screen TV for a couple hundred dollars. Now, why is that? It's because the first innovations are usually most expensive because the companies that innovated, they suck a lot of money into research and development. They have to recoup their investment, and once they do, then the prices start dropping. Other competitors see, oh, this is how they did it, We can do that too. You have more competitors enter the marketplace. That then drives the prices down again, and before you know it, everybody has a flat screen TV now, which is super easy if you have to move, you know, do you ever have a look, I've moved a lot in my life, and you could move a lot more flat screen TVs more easily then you can move a single tube TV. Those things were murder anyway. Cities that built more new apartments in recent years largely saw rents plummet. The cities that did not build more new apartments did not see rents plummet. On the list number one in new unit growth, so the cities that added the most Number one was Austin, number two Nashville, Tennessee, and number three Charlotte, North Carolina. Give it up, Queens, City, Good Job number three in the number of new unit growth a five year average six point three percent that led to a five percent decline in the rents. Coming in at number six on the list Raleigh, North Carolina, with five and a half percent new unit growth, and they saw a decline in their rents down seven point nine percent. Housing supply increases equals a reduction in rents. All right, that'll do it for this episode. Thank you so much for listening. I could not do the show without your support and the support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like, please support them too and tell them you heard it here. You can also become a patron at my Patreon page or go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so much for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.

