The weakest defense of NC's mask law (05-20-2024--Hour3)
The Pete Kaliner ShowMay 20, 202400:29:2727.01 MB

The weakest defense of NC's mask law (05-20-2024--Hour3)

This episode is presented by Carolina Readiness Supply Republican North Carolina lawmakers want to change the masking law back to what it was pre-COVID, by removing an exemption for wearing masks in public for public health. They say the exemption has since allowed protesters and criminals greater anonymity as they engage in violence and lawless activities. But Democrats are pretending they don't understand the motivation and have mounted unpersuasive arguments.

Subscribe to the podcast at: https://ThePeteKalinerShow.com/ 

All the links to Pete's Prep are free: https://patreon.com/petekalinershow 

Get exclusive content here!: https://thepetekalinershow.com/

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

[00:00:00] What's going on?

[00:00:06] Thank you so much for listening to this podcast.

[00:00:08] It is heard live every day from noon to three on WBT radio in Charlotte.

[00:00:12] And if you want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily

[00:00:17] show prep with all the links, become a patron, go to the Pete Kaliner show.com.

[00:00:22] Make sure you hit the subscribe button, get every episode for free, right to your smartphone

[00:00:25] or tablet.

[00:00:26] And again, thank you so much for your support.

[00:00:29] There's a show called State Lines.

[00:00:30] It's on PBS.

[00:00:32] And I saw a clip over the weekend of a couple of lawmakers having a discussion over the

[00:00:40] change in the North Carolina masking law, the mask law.

[00:00:47] Right.

[00:00:48] Now, the law was like unchanged for 70 years.

[00:00:56] When the pandemic hit, North Carolina lawmakers changed the law to add in a provision, an

[00:01:04] exemption, if you will.

[00:01:06] And I have the law in front of me.

[00:01:08] I went over this last week, some of the history on this stuff.

[00:01:12] But essentially, there is an exemption from the provision of the article of the of the

[00:01:16] law that says if you have a.

[00:01:24] Where is it, physical health or safety of the wearer or others, any person wearing a

[00:01:29] mask for the purpose of ensuring the physical health or safety of the wearer or others.

[00:01:34] OK, that's an exemption under the law where you're not allowed to wear masks when you're

[00:01:40] going out and about in public, when you're at parades, when you're at cross burnings,

[00:01:44] you know, that kind of thing.

[00:01:45] You're not allowed to wear the masks.

[00:01:48] And because this mask and I remember at the time when the pandemic hit, people started

[00:01:55] asking, well, wait a minute, we have this mask law.

[00:01:57] Now everybody's required to wear the masks after, of course, they said don't wear the

[00:02:02] masks. And then they were like, OK, now everybody wear the mask.

[00:02:04] Everybody's running out and wearing.

[00:02:06] You know, dishcloths on their face and like just until we could get the real masks in

[00:02:11] and then it's like, oh, these things don't really work either, because of course they

[00:02:14] don't work, which was pretty standard knowledge.

[00:02:18] In fact, before I go into that here, while I do this, this is from 2007.

[00:02:23] This is the Scottish government's framework for responding to an influenza pandemic.

[00:02:29] It's put together by health officials from the Scottish government, but also relying on

[00:02:35] the data and science from the EU and from the WHO and America, all of these

[00:02:42] experts that for some reason.

[00:02:46] Within five years, six years, they all flipped on this.

[00:02:52] Guidance, because Section 8.6 says, although the perception that wearing a face mask in

[00:03:01] public places may be beneficial is widely held, that this perception is a widely held

[00:03:07] perception that if everybody wears a face mask in public places, that there's a benefit

[00:03:11] to that. They say, quote, there is little actual evidence of proportionate benefit from

[00:03:16] widespread use.

[00:03:18] The government will not therefore be stockpiling face masks for general use.

[00:03:23] If individuals who are not symptomatic choose to purchase and wear face masks in public

[00:03:29] places, they should be worn properly and disposed of safely to reduce infection spread.

[00:03:35] And why is that? And this is the I had to point this out when we were having these debates

[00:03:40] back in 2020 when the pandemic first hit and people would say, oh, they don't do masks, do

[00:03:45] no good. Well, not necessarily.

[00:03:49] They they do capture some of the debris, some of the projectiles, right?

[00:03:54] They do stop some of that stuff and it gets on the inside of your mask, which is why you

[00:03:57] really should be changing the mask often throughout the day, because otherwise if you are

[00:04:04] infected, you're going to be re-inhaling the the virus.

[00:04:09] And then you got to throw it away and you don't want that to come into contact with any

[00:04:12] surfaces or any other people or anything like that.

[00:04:15] Right. So but but the larger stuff it's going to catch.

[00:04:18] But the the micro droplets, or as I call it, the lung juice, that stuff just gets suspended.

[00:04:24] It goes it's so small, it goes through the masks and it just kind of hangs in the air because

[00:04:29] it's lighter than air, which is why ventilation was so essential.

[00:04:33] Yet for some reason, largely ignored.

[00:04:36] By all of the experts.

[00:04:38] They were recommending the three W's I advocated putting a fourth W in there, I wasn't

[00:04:44] even saying change your W's, I was just saying add a fourth W wind.

[00:04:49] Right to create cross ventilation, open windows, get some fans going, move the air around

[00:04:54] so it disperses the micro droplets anyway.

[00:04:57] Wearing masks, they say at all times is not practical.

[00:05:00] So decisions in occupational settings must take account of the degree of risk associated

[00:05:07] with particular occupations or activities and be based on joint risk assessments carried

[00:05:10] out by employers and staff representatives.

[00:05:13] Surgical face masks or respirators provide a physical barrier against the influenza

[00:05:18] virus, provided that they are an appropriate type worn correctly, changed frequently,

[00:05:24] removed properly, disposed of safely and used in combination with good universal hygiene

[00:05:29] behavior. Face masks can be used to help protect those who may, for example, be at

[00:05:35] occupational risk from close or frequent contact with symptomatic patients.

[00:05:39] So in other words, health care providers working at a retirement home or something,

[00:05:45] right? This is to avoid contaminating others if they have no choice but to leave their

[00:05:52] home. They're going to say we have significant communication supply, logistic training

[00:05:56] aspects will be needed, will need to be addressed.

[00:05:59] Disposable masks or respirators should generally only be worn once for no longer than the

[00:06:05] time recommended by the manufacturer and then discarded in an appropriate receptacle.

[00:06:10] Things that people did not do right during the pandemic.

[00:06:13] None of this stuff happened.

[00:06:15] Really, people were wearing they got their little they got their friends to sew them a

[00:06:20] face mask and they would wear these things until they became.

[00:06:23] I never forget, we went into a restaurant that after the restaurants had started reopening in

[00:06:27] Charlotte. I'm not going to say which one it was, but it was one of these types of line

[00:06:30] operations, right? Where you go in and you build your own dish or sub or sandwich or

[00:06:37] taco, whatever. See, I'm trying to be vague about it, so I'm not disclosing the place.

[00:06:41] And so we went in there and the guy, the very first guy.

[00:06:46] And his face mask is nearly translucent from all of the grease that is on the outside, he

[00:06:55] keeps because he keeps adjusting it and keeps he's got the gloved hands.

[00:06:59] Right. So he's wearing the plastic gloves on his hands and he's making the food and he

[00:07:06] keeps reaching up and readjusting the mask with the gloved hands.

[00:07:09] And then he keeps making food like, dude.

[00:07:12] Why are you even wearing these things?

[00:07:14] Why are you wearing the mask?

[00:07:15] Why are you wearing the gloves if you are doing this action so much so that the whole

[00:07:21] front of your mask is grease stained?

[00:07:25] That's worse. It's actually worse, because if he wasn't wearing the mask, he would not be

[00:07:30] touching his nose and his mouth and his face is his breathing hole.

[00:07:34] He wouldn't be touching it so much.

[00:07:38] So. Masks in order to combat the micro droplets, not terribly effective, which, again.

[00:07:46] The experts knew for decades they have known, but it all changed.

[00:07:53] During the covid pandemic and so the General Assembly came along and they're like, OK, well,

[00:07:58] we have this law on the books that says you can't wear masks in public, and this was from

[00:08:03] the KKK era.

[00:08:04] They did not want people running around with the hoods.

[00:08:07] There's some language in there, too, about burning.

[00:08:10] Well, then say burning crosses, but like going to other people's houses and such.

[00:08:14] You're not allowed to show up in people's houses wearing masks.

[00:08:18] Which I remember there was a guy I worked with, he said that he went trick or treating and

[00:08:22] he was like 17 or something, and his neighbor recognized him and said, you're you're

[00:08:27] breaking the law, kid, you're over the age of 16, you can't be wearing that mask out in

[00:08:31] public. And like, oh, I wasn't aware of that.

[00:08:34] But there is an exemption for the holiday revelers and such.

[00:08:38] Also, if you work in the trades, you have an employment situation where you have to wear

[00:08:43] the mask. And but the other one, traditional holiday costumes in season.

[00:08:47] So, you know, you can dress up with the big fluffy beard if it's a mask, you know,

[00:08:51] whatever. So now people have started using the masks after the covid pandemic.

[00:08:59] Well, actually, even during really they would go out and they would protest, engage in

[00:09:04] illegal behavior and wear the masks not for safety purposes, but for criminality in

[00:09:12] order to mask their identity.

[00:09:14] So people would not recognize them.

[00:09:16] Law enforcement could not arrest them.

[00:09:18] And that trend has continued and we see it now with the Tentifada.

[00:09:22] So now the state lawmakers are like, you know what?

[00:09:25] Let's go back and pull that exemption that we added during the pandemic.

[00:09:28] Let's delete it and go back to the way the law was for 70 years.

[00:09:34] Outrage has ensued.

[00:09:36] How dare you? You're trying to kill people, right?

[00:09:40] There are people that have very legitimate concerns about their their health and all

[00:09:43] that. Right. OK, so it started because here's the argument that.

[00:09:49] They put the exemption in because of covid, but then it doesn't stop the spread.

[00:09:54] So then the response is, well, there are other ailments then that they're trying to guard

[00:09:57] against. OK, but then there was no enforcement prior to covid on any of those other

[00:10:02] ailments when people would wear masks for that reason.

[00:10:04] So what's the problem?

[00:10:06] Right. Oh, and by the way, if you wear the mask and a law enforcement officer asks you

[00:10:11] to take it down, you have to take it down.

[00:10:13] You got to you got to pull the mask off.

[00:10:14] You got to show them your face, which that's not happening either.

[00:10:18] So right.

[00:10:20] The lack of enforcement over a 70 year period should count for something.

[00:10:23] No. So I heard this debate on this program on PBS, I don't think I've heard a weaker

[00:10:30] argument really for any kind of political issue ever.

[00:10:34] All righty. So let me get to this audio clip here.

[00:10:38] The first let's hear from state lines, the first person you're going to hear, I believe,

[00:10:43] is Benton. Sorry.

[00:10:45] Sorry. He is a Republican from Johnston County state senator.

[00:10:49] And then the woman's voice you hear is Maria Servania.

[00:10:51] She's a Democrat from Wake County and she is a representative.

[00:10:54] We've had a law in the impetus of that law at that time was a strong one and still

[00:11:02] prevails now.

[00:11:03] What has been changed before the pandemic and now currently is to take out specific text

[00:11:11] when it comes to medical masking and public health safety.

[00:11:16] Why? Why take that out if, in fact, it's said by my colleague here that it's not against

[00:11:25] N95 or medical masking.

[00:11:26] Why take it out of the law now if it's not necessary?

[00:11:32] This seems to me more that.

[00:11:37] We're trying to have a different outcome than actually what we're trying to press into this

[00:11:42] law. So remember.

[00:11:43] OK, I don't even understand what you're saying.

[00:11:48] Well, we try. In other words, there's an ulterior motive going on here.

[00:11:51] I love the I love when Democrats play this game that they don't have any idea why you're

[00:11:56] proposing such a thing.

[00:11:59] This same approach, the same rhetorical tactic was done, and this is even a worst case.

[00:12:04] Well, the same tactic was employed when Republicans cracked down on violent protests and

[00:12:14] riots last year, I believe it was maybe two years ago.

[00:12:19] After what we saw in downtown Raleigh where they were burning cars up, remember, and

[00:12:24] Speaker Tim Moore talked about seeing all of this stuff from his apartment window right off

[00:12:29] the balconies like there are things on fire in front of his apartment.

[00:12:32] And. There was this push then to say we're going to stiffen the penalties already

[00:12:38] existing, but we're going to stiffen the penalties to send a message that we're not going

[00:12:42] to put up with this garbage.

[00:12:44] State law is going to get tougher for people engaged in violent protests and riots.

[00:12:51] And Democrats came to the floor of the House and the Senate and they pretended like they

[00:12:56] hadn't seen any of the stuff going on for the last two years prior from the Chaz Chop

[00:13:02] Out West to the burning and looting in Raleigh.

[00:13:06] But. I don't know why you need to do this, I'm afraid some people, some innocent people

[00:13:12] might be swept up in it.

[00:13:14] There's always it's always this this argument, this defense.

[00:13:19] And that's what they're trying to do right now.

[00:13:21] What about somebody who's sick and.

[00:13:24] They want to wear a mask.

[00:13:25] I don't know why we need to go back to it's like and I said it the other day, Abe Jones,

[00:13:31] retired judge, Democrat lawmaker.

[00:13:34] And he was a he was a supporter of the tougher penalties for the rioters.

[00:13:40] And he called him out, he said his fellow Democrats, he's like, we all know what we're

[00:13:44] talking about here.

[00:13:45] Right. There's no way playing hide the ball on this.

[00:13:50] Everybody understands what's going on.

[00:13:52] You got a riot out front and if you got a riot.

[00:13:56] We're saying if you're engaged in the riotous behavior and you are convicted of it, the

[00:14:01] penalty is going to be more severe.

[00:14:02] That's it. Now, if you've got other issues about how cases are tried and all of that,

[00:14:08] these are different questions.

[00:14:10] But simply raising a penalty, that's not so this this this game of I don't know why

[00:14:15] you're trying to do this.

[00:14:17] Yes, you do. Everybody knows why.

[00:14:20] Because people are engaged in unlawful activity, wearing masks and pretending it's for

[00:14:25] quote health and safety purposes.

[00:14:27] And it's not it's not for health or safety.

[00:14:31] It's to preserve their anonymity so they can they can break the law and have a better

[00:14:36] chance of getting away with it.

[00:14:38] Jazz Shaw writing at Hot Air dot com headline North Carolina moving to ban face masks

[00:14:44] for health reasons.

[00:14:45] And Jazz starts off by quoting WRAL News report that the North Carolina Senate voted

[00:14:51] along party lines Wednesday.

[00:14:53] So last week to ban anybody from wearing masks in public for health reasons, following an

[00:14:58] emotional debate about the wisdom of the proposal.

[00:15:01] Republican supporters of the ban said it would help police crack down on protesters who

[00:15:05] wear masks, which some lawmakers called a growing concern, saying demonstrators are

[00:15:10] abusing covid-19 pandemic era norms to wear masks that hide their identities.

[00:15:18] So that's that's the reason.

[00:15:20] That's the rationale.

[00:15:23] So Representative Maria Sirvania pretending not to know why this is being proposed,

[00:15:32] like it's not believable to me.

[00:15:34] The public health and safety.

[00:15:35] This then is Senator Benton.

[00:15:38] Sorry. He is a Republican from Johnston County.

[00:15:40] Exception did not exist in North Carolina law until January or excuse me, until 2020.

[00:15:46] So it's never been part of the law ever previously.

[00:15:49] It's never been an issue previously.

[00:15:51] It is never ever.

[00:15:52] I mean, and I think some of the frustration we've had is that to the extent that this was

[00:15:56] an issue, it would have arisen in the 70 years prior.

[00:15:59] There are members sitting in the chamber today that rose and spoke against this issue on

[00:16:05] the floor on Wednesday who have had an opportunity since the 1970s to bring these same

[00:16:10] amendments. No lawsuit has been filed by Disability Rights.

[00:16:13] No lawsuit has ever been filed by the ACLU.

[00:16:15] It has never been an issue.

[00:16:17] This is a political point that's being made for campaign purpose.

[00:16:21] And I want to bring it back to the point that in those 70 years, we did not even have the

[00:16:26] earliest versions of covid.

[00:16:31] So we need to come to our modern times to know that even covid-19 is endemic.

[00:16:37] We still haven't taken it away.

[00:16:39] Like I said, like I'm an epidemiologist.

[00:16:41] We know this. We need to have our individual rights protected.

[00:16:48] We feel like we want to protect our community or ourselves not to get covid or flu.

[00:16:54] That can be life threatening.

[00:16:56] Nobody is saying that somebody who is immunocompromised or is sick or has a health

[00:17:02] issue cannot wear a mask.

[00:17:05] Nobody has ever been arrested.

[00:17:06] Nobody has ever been prosecuted in the seven years prior to this.

[00:17:11] It's not going to happen today.

[00:17:12] It's not going to happen tomorrow.

[00:17:14] The senators who are speaking out against this know that the Department of Health and

[00:17:18] Human Services knows that lawyers know this.

[00:17:20] Judges know this. Everybody knows this.

[00:17:22] Members of the chamber are using this to score political points to generate fear.

[00:17:28] And one of the other issues that came up, one of the other issues that came up in the

[00:17:32] DHS email was one of their concerns was that public could become confused and fearful

[00:17:38] based on this language.

[00:17:40] And there are Democrats, some of your colleagues in the Senate chamber who are causing

[00:17:44] that. There are some of the news media who are causing that.

[00:17:47] So instead of framing the issues where it is, we are where we are today, which is very

[00:17:51] disappointing. And I could counter that because this is a health issue.

[00:17:56] This is a personal safety issue.

[00:18:00] And the fear, I believe, is being caused by those.

[00:18:04] And I'm not going to say Democrat, Republican.

[00:18:07] I want to say. The people who are trying to take this two lines out of our current law,

[00:18:14] it is going to cause confusion not only for people, but law enforcement and how they're

[00:18:18] supposed to administer the law.

[00:18:21] You cannot guarantee that no one's going to be arrested.

[00:18:24] You can't as you sit here now.

[00:18:26] Can we look at a track record of North Carolina prosecutorial discretion since 1953 and

[00:18:31] assume and assume that the interpretation by the Department of Health and Human Services

[00:18:36] is going to show that nobody is going to be arrested?

[00:18:40] And again, I'm going to bring it back.

[00:18:42] We did not have COVID 70 years ago.

[00:18:45] We had SARS. We've had Zika.

[00:18:47] We've had various pandemics.

[00:18:48] Ago. Yes, that was during the period of time.

[00:18:51] Correct. But we didn't instill a mass mandate during those times because we had

[00:18:56] preparedness done to make sure our people were safe.

[00:19:00] Wait, what? We had preparedness done to make sure our people were safe.

[00:19:04] What do you what is she even talking about now?

[00:19:06] This doesn't even make any sense.

[00:19:09] No, the 70 years of no prosecutions for anybody wearing any kinds of masks for health and

[00:19:16] safety purposes, I I would submit that is a track record that would indicate that there

[00:19:22] isn't an appetite for law enforcement and for district attorneys to go around busting

[00:19:28] people during allergy season when they want to mask up to reduce their pollen counts.

[00:19:34] And that, by the way, and you got wildfires going on.

[00:19:36] I was out West when the wildfires hit and people wore masks because the smoke, the

[00:19:42] particulate matter was so dense and thick that the masks did help.

[00:19:47] So people weren't running around getting arrested for that.

[00:19:51] No, it's when you are rioting, you're protesting, you're out on the streets and you're

[00:19:56] wearing the masks in order to cover your face so you can engage in the illegal activity.

[00:20:01] If they catch you, then there would be an increased penalty.

[00:20:05] That's all that that's all that we're saying.

[00:20:08] But for some reason, now we got to demagogue this issue as well and make people very afraid

[00:20:13] that cops are going to be like busting down their door or stopping and pulling them over.

[00:20:17] I see you wearing a mask in your car alone, you know, I'm going to arrest you.

[00:20:22] I'm going to pull you over and arrest you for that.

[00:20:24] No, they weren't doing that for 70 years.

[00:20:26] Why are they going to start doing that now?

[00:20:28] OK, if you're listening to this podcast, you are obviously paying attention to the world

[00:20:32] around us. You also have really great taste, I might add.

[00:20:36] But if you haven't started getting prepared for various emergencies, I got to ask, what

[00:20:40] are you waiting for? Please call my friends Bill and Jan at Carolina Readiness Supply

[00:20:45] and they'll help get you started.

[00:20:46] If you have no idea how to start, they can help you.

[00:20:48] If you're an experienced prepper, they can help you to being prepared is just smart.

[00:20:53] We've already established that you're smart.

[00:20:55] I mean, you listen to this podcast after all.

[00:20:57] So let's put those smarts into action.

[00:21:00] Go to Carolina readiness dot com.

[00:21:02] That's Carolina readiness dot com or call them at 828-226-7239.

[00:21:09] Carolina Readiness Supply has 2000 square feet of supplies as well as educational

[00:21:13] materials that you're going to need for any kind of emergency.

[00:21:16] Veteran owned Carolina Readiness Supply.

[00:21:19] Will you be ready when the lights go out?

[00:21:22] Email from Stan, who says it doesn't make any difference what laws you pass, what the

[00:21:26] law says and what you say the penalties are if what is actually enforced is politically

[00:21:31] selective. Yeah, that is true.

[00:21:34] And the Hellion says.

[00:21:38] I still have people wearing a mask to the gym, but it is never.

[00:21:43] Ever covering the nose, there's at least seven or eight of these folks on Saturdays

[00:21:47] and Sundays. And then or emptying out a retail store of all their inventory, wearing

[00:21:54] a mask, right? Yeah, the legal activity, right?

[00:21:56] That's that people using the masks in order to conceal their identity during crimes.

[00:22:02] Johnny, welcome to the program.

[00:22:03] Hello, Johnny. Sorry, I had my mask on.

[00:22:08] Ah, OK, well then.

[00:22:10] Ah, I'm driving down the road with my windows up and my mask on.

[00:22:14] Always got to kick out of that one.

[00:22:16] So listen, instead of trying to arrest everybody for wearing a mask, how about coming

[00:22:22] from the angle that says the law says if you're going to protest, you can't do it with

[00:22:29] a mask on or you will be arrested.

[00:22:32] Right, that would be much easier.

[00:22:34] And you'd have a more finite group to deal with.

[00:22:37] The other thing is, you know, if this state came up with a mask license, it would be

[00:22:45] another form of revenue.

[00:22:46] Well, I don't know. I'm not going to endorse that at all.

[00:22:49] No, look, there's there's reason to believe that this law is on shaky ground

[00:22:54] constitutionally just on its face.

[00:22:57] Just because it's 70 years old doesn't mean that it's going to sustain or withstand

[00:23:02] constitutional scrutiny.

[00:23:04] Right, because if somebody wants to wear a mask to to go about their day or whatever, like

[00:23:10] technically, yeah, they would be in violation.

[00:23:12] Or why am I allowed to wear it for a costume in season but not outside of the season?

[00:23:16] Whatever that season might be.

[00:23:18] Right. So if all it's going to take, I'm sure, is a couple of well-funded lawsuits.

[00:23:23] And when that happens, I suspect a lot of these mask laws are going to drop, which I'm

[00:23:27] sure the KKKs would be very happy about.

[00:23:29] But but yeah, for all these protesters, though, if you made a new law that says

[00:23:34] protesters cannot wear a mask or even if you're wearing a mask in the commission of a

[00:23:39] crime, that adds more time to your penalty.

[00:23:43] That's what this law. Well, that's what this law would do as well.

[00:23:46] So it strips out the exemption and then adds an increase in the penalty.

[00:23:51] Nice. Yeah. So that's where they're trying to get at.

[00:23:54] I don't know if this is the way they're actually going to be able to do it, though.

[00:23:56] So, yeah, appreciate the call, Johnny.

[00:23:58] Thanks. Let me go over here.

[00:23:59] This is Dave.

[00:24:01] David. Well, Dave, welcome to the program.

[00:24:04] Yeah, I'm just wondering, since you are an expert in Charlotte history, please tell us

[00:24:10] all about General Joseph Graham, please.

[00:24:13] Why would you think I'm an expert in Charlotte history?

[00:24:16] Well, you've been spewing this nonsense about the Meck deck all day.

[00:24:20] So obviously and you just did 20 minutes of research on masks.

[00:24:24] Obviously, you wouldn't spew this kind of misinformation without doing the least bit of

[00:24:30] research. So please, what was the about?

[00:24:33] What was the message about what was the misinformation?

[00:24:36] General Joseph Graham, who is what was the misinformation, Dave?

[00:24:40] So you're not going to. How about Humphrey?

[00:24:42] Dave, what was the misinformation?

[00:24:45] You know, Dave, you've leveled an accusation.

[00:24:47] What is the misinformation?

[00:24:48] Are you familiar with Dave?

[00:24:50] All right, Dave, this is not the way this is going to work.

[00:24:52] Dave, if you you make an assertion, I'm going to ask you explain the assertion.

[00:24:57] Why? Why are you making this assertion?

[00:25:00] What is that assertion about?

[00:25:01] You you you set up a straw man initially by saying I have claimed to be some expert.

[00:25:05] I have not claimed to be the expert on Charlotte history at all.

[00:25:10] So I ask you then.

[00:25:12] Why would you say that?

[00:25:13] You say, well, I'm spewing misinformation.

[00:25:15] OK, well, what is the misinformation?

[00:25:16] It's a very clear question.

[00:25:18] What is the misinformation?

[00:25:19] I have been. Oh, I'm going to make.

[00:25:21] Oh, all right. Have you did you even hear any of that?

[00:25:23] OK, so what is the misinformation?

[00:25:26] General Joseph Graham was wounded nine times while defending Charlotte from Cornwallis.

[00:25:32] He is an eyewitness to the Mech Deck.

[00:25:35] And so when you take a crap on local patriots and our first military veterans,

[00:25:41] you are calling General Joseph Graham a liar.

[00:25:45] And you're doing it just so that you can bring the attention to yourself

[00:25:48] on the very day when we're supposed to be honoring these men.

[00:25:51] It's pathetic.

[00:25:53] I say, is this David Fleming?

[00:25:55] Is that who this is?

[00:25:56] Are you the author of the book?

[00:25:57] The guy that is attacking me as a mag of somebody on I've been on Twitter.

[00:26:02] You've been ducking.

[00:26:03] I've been I'm the one you've been ducking for a year and ducking your show.

[00:26:07] How have I ducked you, Dave?

[00:26:10] So are you calling General Joseph Graham a liar?

[00:26:13] First off, just answer.

[00:26:14] Yes, no, of course, Dave.

[00:26:16] What so what was my position on the Mech Deck's veracity?

[00:26:19] You tell me if you're calling him a liar.

[00:26:21] Come on, Dave.

[00:26:23] What was my position on the Mech Deck's veracity?

[00:26:26] Are you going to are you calling him a liar or not?

[00:26:28] Why would this is you're ridiculous, Dave?

[00:26:31] See, this is probably it's not probably.

[00:26:33] There's a reason, Dave.

[00:26:34] There's a reason why people call in and get what do you mean?

[00:26:38] I took your back up the stuff that you're dropping.

[00:26:40] I literally had I literally had the president of the Historical Association on.

[00:26:46] She called in, talked with her for a good 10 minutes, took your call.

[00:26:50] Talk about this.

[00:26:52] So but that's the thing, like I'm asking you a question,

[00:26:55] you seem to be very intent on ascribing motives and beliefs to me.

[00:27:00] And when I ask you to just know, no, Dave, all I've asked you is

[00:27:05] all I've asked you is to state for me what you believe.

[00:27:08] I have said what my beliefs are about the veracity of the Mech Deck.

[00:27:13] Give you the information and what have I said?

[00:27:16] Back off like what have I said?

[00:27:17] They back off like a cow.

[00:27:19] What have I said, Dave?

[00:27:20] Man up and do the what have I said, Dave?

[00:27:23] What have I said, Dave?

[00:27:26] You said no shred of evidence.

[00:27:27] There's over well, no shred of evidence.

[00:27:30] Did I say that today?

[00:27:31] Did I say no shred of evidence?

[00:27:32] I don't recall saying that you have.

[00:27:34] Have you said that not on the air?

[00:27:35] I've not said that today.

[00:27:36] Did you call Mech Deck believers fringe group people?

[00:27:40] Did I call fringe group people?

[00:27:42] When I first got to Charlotte, I said that was what the perception was.

[00:27:45] Absolutely.

[00:27:47] So you've you've read Scott Seifert's book.

[00:27:49] I know I just found out about Scott Seifert's book.

[00:27:51] And you've and you've read my book.

[00:27:53] No, I was going to read your book.

[00:27:54] And I said I wanted to read your book.

[00:27:56] No, no, no, no, no.

[00:27:56] I think Dave, because I remember you came through, you were selling the book last

[00:28:00] year and I said, oh, I need to read that book.

[00:28:02] And then you started yelling at me and screaming at me on Twitter, if I recall

[00:28:05] correctly. And I think I muted your account at that point because you're just an

[00:28:09] obnoxious troll. So that's how that went down.

[00:28:13] That's not ducking you.

[00:28:14] That's just not wasting my efforts with you and not giving you a platform to sell

[00:28:18] your book. And then when I saw here that today now you've started attacking me and

[00:28:23] calling me some trolling Charlotte's first military veterans with MAGA levels of

[00:28:30] lies and misinformation like, OK, I know what your politics are now.

[00:28:35] I have no interest actually in engaging you because you're just an obnoxious troll.

[00:28:39] But good luck on your book.

[00:28:42] And I appreciate the work that you did tracking down the historical accuracy.

[00:28:47] Absolutely. Definitely worth it.

[00:28:50] But if you don't even know my position, I don't know why you're so angry at me for

[00:28:52] holding a position you don't know I hold.

[00:28:54] All right. So that being said, that's a wrap for the show.

[00:28:58] All right. That'll do it for this episode.

[00:29:00] Thank you so much for listening.

[00:29:01] I could not do the show without your support and the support of the businesses that

[00:29:05] advertise on the podcast.

[00:29:07] So if you'd like, please support them, too, and tell them you heard it here.

[00:29:10] You can also become a patron at my Patreon page or go to the peak calendar show

[00:29:14] dot com. Again, thank you so much for listening.

[00:29:17] And don't break anything while I'm gone.