The smoking gun in Obamagate is the leaking (07-23-2025--Hour2)

What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily show prep with all the links, become a patron, go to dpeteclendershow dot com. Make sure you hit the subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your smartphone or tablet, And again, thank you so much for your support. Here's Donald Trump from the Oval Office yesterday. He had the President of the Philippines there as well. He makes one reference to him. And here's the Q and a president. Here's a farmer Justice Department seeing an interview with Blaine Maxwell. Tour question about Elaine Maxwell. Then you don't know anything about it. They're gonna know what meet her, They're gonna there's. Your Denity Turning General office reached out to Glaine Nashwelle's attorney asked you, yeah, I don't know about it, but I think it's something that would be sound appropriate to do you your Deputy Turny General, as your former attorney from THEE. No, I have no consider that he's very all right. So these three questions are all about interviewing Gallaine Maxwell and do you feel it's inappropriate your deputy was attorney who used to work for you in that relationship or whatever like, And he's just like, yeah, I think it's appropriate. Yeah, go ahead and do it. I don't know anything about that, and then he pivots. He's a very talented person, he's very smart. I didn't know that they were going to do it. I don't really follow that too much. It's it's a sort of a witch hunt, just a continuation of the witch hunt. The witch hunt that you should be. Talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold, Chelsea Gabbert. What they did to this country. In twenty sixteen, starting in twenty sixteen, but going up all the way going up to twenty twenty of the election. They tried to rig the election. Then they got caught, and they should be very severe consequt what is for that? You know, when we caught Hillary Clinton, I said, you know what, let's not go too far here. It's the ex wife of a president. And I thought it was sort of terrible and I let her off the hook, and I'm very happy I did. But it's time to start after what they did to me, and whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly. So people say, oh, you know a group, It's not a group, it's Obama. His orders are on the paper, the papers are signed. The papers came right out of their office. They sent everything to be highly classified. Well the highly classified it has been released. And what they did in twenty sixteen and in twenty twenty is very criminal. It's criminal at the highest level. So that's really the things you should be talking about. I know nothing about the other but I think it's appropriate that they do go I asked. You about that. As a president Tolby Godder has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who. Should the dots target as part of their investigation? What's the city figures in you a lot that. Manstry Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama. He started it, and Biden was there with him, and Komi was there, and Clapper, the whole group was there, Brennan, they were all there in a. Room right here. This is the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then. But that's okay. I have nice pictures up. They came out of the vaults. They were in there for a hundred years. This is much more beautiful. We have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what, if you look. At that those papers, they have a stone called and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place. It was them too, But the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama. Have you heard of him? Yes, And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press. For his entire life. True, that's the one they look. He's guilty. It's not a question, you know. I like to say, let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscape the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined. Even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like that and we have all of the documents, and from what Tolsey told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a three dollars bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent twelve million dollars to Christopher Steel to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction, and they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to get and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steel report was a disaster, all lies, all fabrication, all admitted and admitted fraud. She paid twelve million. Dollars and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steel. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what I talk about all the time, the fake news, how bad it is, But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it they read it and they said we don't believe it. And it was only after substantially, like a month and a half after the election that I got printed. And it was a big wisp. It was just like a bang of nothing because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody. And I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper. But for this one moment they said, this is boost. We can't put this in, and neither could any other Wall Street journals allows the paper, very very dishonest paper. As you see. I'm suing them for a lot of money because they do things very badly. It's a really it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the Steel report. It was the dossier, remember the famous dossier. I called it the News dossier. The News wouldn't publish it, and I'm amazed they had two and a half months. It was finished, two and a half months. That was supposed to be what was going to happen and it got published a couple of months after the election, and frankly, nobody cared too much about it. But that was a big thing. No, No, we caught Hillary Clinton, we caught Barack Hussein Obama. They're the ones, and then you have many many people under them, Susan Rice, They're all there, The names are all there, and I guess they figured they're going to put this in classified information and nobody will ever see it again. But it doesn't work that way. And it's the most unbelievable thing I think I've ever read. So you ought to take a look at that and stop talking about nonsense, because this is big stuff. Never has a thing like this happened in the history of our country. And by the way, it morphed. Into the twenty twenty race, and the twenty twenty race was rigged and a rigged election, and because it was rigged, we have millions of people in our country. We have we had inflation. We solved the inflation problem, but millions and millions of people came into our country because of. That, and people that shouldn't have been, people. From gangs and from jails and from mental institutions, people that we don't want in our country, and people that were getting out, dangerous people. Eleven eight hundred and eighty eight murderers. Many of them fifty percent more than fifty percent murdered more than one person. I hate to say this was such a distinguished guest, but you know, they asked me a question. I got to answer the question. No, Barack Hussein Obama is the ring leader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him, and so was Sleepy Joe Biden, and so were the rest of them, call me clapper, the whole group. And they tried to rig an election, and they got caught. And then they did rig the election in twenty twenty. And then because I knew I won the election by a lot, I did it a third time and I won in a landslide. Every swing state. Won the popular vote, but I won that all the same way in twenty twenty. And look at the damage that was cast. All right, So there's the president's full comments on this, the treason comment about Obama the ring leader of Obamagate. I'm going to walk through the chronology on this. There's only a couple dates as part of this timeline. It goes back to December twenty sixteen. All right. If you're listening to this show, you know I try to keep up with all sorts of current events, and I know you do too, And you've probably heard me say get your news from multiple sources. Why well, because it's how you detect media bias, which is why I've been so impressed with ground News. It's an app and it's a website and it combines news from around the world in one place, so you can compare coverage and verify information. You can check it out at check dot ground dot News. I put the link in the podcast description too. I started using ground News a few months ago and more recently chose to work with them as an affiliate because it lets me see clearly how stories get covered and by whom. The blind spot feature shows you which stories get ignored by the left and the right. See for yourself. Check dot ground, dot news slash pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll get fifteen percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage plan to get unlimited access to every feature. Your subscription then not only helps my podcast, but it also supports ground News as they make the media landscape more transparent. So here is the relevant timeline. December seventh, twenty sixteen, right, so a month after the election where Trump has just shocked the world by defeating Hillary Clinton. So that's December seventh, the next day, December eighth, the next day December ninth, and then a month less than a month later January sixth, twenty seventeen, right before Trump gets sworn into office. So those are the relevant dates. So what happened on the first date December seventh? This was when the intelligence community assessment was prepared for Barack Obama as part of his PDB, the Presidential Daily Brief, and the intelligence assessment was that Russia did not tamper with the election. They did not hack the machines, they did not have the capability to do so, there is no evidence that they had the intention of doing so. That was the initial ICA December eighth. The editor of that ICA, which generally takes a couple months to put together and you run it through all the different intel agencies and stuff, the editor of the ICA cancels the ICA that was that was done on the seventh. The next day, it's canceled, and the reason for canceling it was based on new guidance. That's not new information, that's guidance. Where does the guidance come from? Well, according to the declassified memos now that the Director of National Intelligence Tulca Gabbard declassified on Friday, another batch came out today that people are sifting through and oh boy, there's some stuff in there too. The memos stated, per the president's request, that's the new guidance. Obama orders a new ICA on December ninth, So the seventh, the original ICA is completed saying Russia didn't tamper with the election. The eighth, the next day the ICA is canceled, where it's rescinded based on new guidance. And then December ninth, Obama orders a new ICA and he puts Brennan in charge of it. Why is that important? Well, Brennan was the guy who was all in on the Steele dossier. Why because he coordinated it the head of the CIA. He's the guy, he's the connecting point, he's the funnel point for the British intel that came in as part of the Steele dossier from Christopher Steele, a former British MI six agent. And then January sixth, before Trump takes office, the new ICA is released, which includes the Steele dossier and not only includes it, it relies on it in order to draw the quote key judgment that Russia wanted Trump to win. That was the motive for the Russian meddaling, not hacking. There was never any proof that Russia hacked into our election system, that they changed any votes, even though Democrats still to this day believe this, like almost half of Democrats still believe that Putin put Trump into office in twenty sixteen. And that's all based on this. This misinformation, this fake news and the meddling in the election is what you keep hearing in all of the reports. It's what Obama cited or is pres Guy cited when they responded to Trump's comments they are about treason. They said, you know, that's just ridiculous, and we don't ever respond to this stuff, but we'll respond to this and whatever whatever, and hey, it's you know, we already had two different assessments that showed Russia was, you know, meddling in our elections, and that part is true. See, this is what this is what the left is doing, the Democrats of the media. But I repeat myself, this is what they're doing. And because yes, I've heard our news too, because we rely on wire services like AP or Reuters. This is the narrative and people who aren't aware of how this works, like when you part When you take these stories and they unfold over a long period of time, there gets to be like a template that gets written as a story quote has legs and you have to kind of recap the story to give the latest development in this story. And so a template gets written that summarizes the crux of the story, and this is the template. An assessment by the US intelligence community published in January of twenty seventeen, concluded that Russia, using social media disinformation hacking that was the DNC hacking and Russian bot farms, sought to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton's campaign and bolster Trump. But see that's not true. That's not true. It didn't find that it sought to bolster Trump. In fact, the Russians, according to some of the information that just came out today, they had a ton of stuff on Hillary that they were looking to use. Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina. Just a quick drive up the mountain and cabins of Ashville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon, maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get family and friends together for a big old reunion. Cabins of Asheville has the ideal spot for you where you can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally located between Ashville and the entrance of the Great Smoky Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces, air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi grills, outdoor tables and your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen cabins, six cottages, two villas, and a great lodge with eleven king sized bedrooms. Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot for you for any occasion, and they have pet friendly accommodations. Call or text eight two eight, three six seven seventy sixty eight or check out all there is to offer at Cabins Offashville dot Com and make memay Marie That'll last a lifetime. The response from Obama's camp spokesperson Patrick Roadenbush quote, out of respect for the Office of the Presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the twenty sixteen in presidential election, but did not successfully manipulate any votes. Right, that's the deflection, because the assessments that came out did find that. The problem is is that the December twenty sixteen revised ICA attached motive to the meddling, and the motive was to help Trump win the race. So if that was true, though, what Gabber just released today, this is what our own intel agencies reported on what they thought the Russian spies knew or thought they knew, And according to our own intelligence, Hillary Clinton was keeping all of her medical problems strictly secret, including from her top staffers. How do we know this, Well, she was running an unprotected server that the Intel Agency said and the FBI said, probably got hacked, likely likely was hacked. The stuff that she kept on her Homebrew server, not an email account. It's not the emails, it's the server, and that was unguarded, and so obviously it got hacked, and everybody got everything that was in there, including probably her medical records and per Russia's intelligence from the DNC hack as well, Obama and party leaders found the state of Hillary Clinton's health to be quote extraordinarily alarming. She suffered from quote intensified psychoemotional problems, including uncontrollable fits of anger, aggressiveness, and cheerfulness. She was placed on a daily schedule of heavy tranquilizers. She was, as we already knew, obsessed with a thirst for power. The renamed KGB. The SVR also had intelligence indicating that Hillary Clinton suffered from type two diabetes, as well as ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. So ask yourself this, If Russia wanted to help Trump win, why not put that out right that's what the Russian spies thought they had, or at least that's what we thought they thought they had. And considering that they probably had access to all of her stuff, they probably did have that. This doesn't work with the motive. And remember the motive is the key here, because the motive launched Crossfire, Hurricane right, it launched the impeachment, it launched the Alpha Bank, smear all of it. And here's the smoking gun. I outlined the key dates here. December seventh, December eighth, and December ninth of twenty sixteen. The first ICA is put together that says Russia did not tamper with the election, they didn't hack the machines and all that, they had no preference. They just tried to sow chaos. The editor then the next day cancels that. He rescinds it under quote new guidance. The day after that, December ninth, Obama orders a new ICA to be conducted, puts Brennan in charge of it, and that day, December ninth, the New York Time publishes a story about the motive. How would they have even known that? How did they even know that? This was a you know, high confidence finding of the intelligence community. They hadn't reworked the ICA, they wouldn't be doing that for the next few weeks. And by the way, all of the other intellagencies besides Clappers, the FBI, you know, Comey's and Brennan's CIA, everybody else was cut out. Highly irregular, also irregular that all of the brass was involved in the ICA, the redraft. So they. They leaked it. They leaked the conclusion that they sought to arrive at with the rewrite of the ICA. There's that's your smoking gun. And by the way, the Washington Post then followed, I think the next day or that day with their own story. Both of those outlets won Pulitzer Prizes for this coverage. So who do I not trust? The Washington Post and the New York Times, right, the ones that want pulletzers for printing planted lies from the Obama administration per the president's request. That's according to the files, that's from the memos. Yeah, this is very bad. And that's why you keep hearing this line that, oh, he's just saying this is a distraction from the Epstein files. Now, like I don't have to be distracted from one story over the other. I can walk in chew gum at the same time. In fact, I can do this talk show and chew gum at the same time. I'm doing it right now, so I'm able to pay attention to both of these stories and both of these investigations as they proceed. Let me go to this is National Review. Yeah, here we go. This is from the Federalist dot com by Molly Hemingway. Top officials working on an intelligence community analysis about Russia's interference in the twenty sixteen election were overruled by CIA Director John Brennan. This is according to records reviewed exclusively by The Federalist. The dispute was over the key judgment in a January twenty seventeen ICA this is the one that got rewritten that Russia had interfered in the elections, specifically because Putin and the Russian government aspired to help President elect Trump's election chances. The senior intelligence officials pointed out that we're writing this stuff the raw intel. They pointed out the lack of evidence to substantiate the claim. They said, quote, we have no intelligence to directly support this aspiration point. The experts did not disagree that Russia had continued its practice of attempting to sow chaos in our elections. They believe the intelligence indicated Russia sought to weaken presumptive winner Hillary Clinton, and those efforts may have indirectly helped Trump, but they were concerned about the lack of evidence for the claim that became the cornerstone of the Russian collusion narrative, in which Trump was accused of conspiring with Russia to steal the election. They wrote, quote, can you really prove Moscow was trying to get Trump elected? And Brennan called the dissenting individuals into his office on December thirtieth, had a lengthy meeting in which they articulated their series serious concerns. The assessment, though he said, will stay the same, so he overruled his own Russian experts in order to keep the steal dossier as part of this report and to keep the motive part of the ica. You know, stories or power. They help us make sense of things, to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the people of our past while transcending generations. They help us process the meaning of life, and our stories are told through images and videos. Preserve your stories with creative video started in nineteen ninety seven and Mint Hill, North Carolina. It was the first company to provide this valuable service, converting images, photos and videos into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums. The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will go over all of the details with you to create a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person or mail them. They'll be ready in a week or two. Memorial videos for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories, all told through images. That's what your photos and videos are. They are your life told through the eyes of everyone around you and all who came before you, and they will tell others to come who you are. Visit create video dot com. Tulsea Gabbard claimed on social media that the intelligence materials that she published were marked declassified on July seventeenth, so a week ago, and that the materials contained evidence of a quote treasonous conspiracy and years long coup orchestrated by Obama administration officials against Donald Trump. In subsequent media appearances, she claimed that more declassified materials on the subject would soon be released, and they have, they have, and so I've got I mean, I've got so much stuff. I'm not going to be able to get to it all. At the heart of this, though, seems to be John Brennan. Yes, Obama apparently made the request to redo the ICA. The Intelligence Community Assessment said redo this tasked it to Brennan. That was in December. On December ninth, that day, The New York Times in the Washington Post published their stories, somehow arriving at the high confidence conclusion that Trump was helped by Putin because Putin wanted Trump to win. There was no evidence to support that. The only evidence that was cited in the ICA to support that was the Steele dossier, which John Brennan had been shopping around for months. He had been shopping it around for months and when his own agency experts on Russia came to him and they were like, dude, this Steele dossier. You can't draw conclusions. And the problem is if you put this thing in, people are going to say, well, this is all ridiculous. Then they're going to discount everything that's in there. Overruled them. He put it in there, and when he wrote his book. He threw those dissenters that were writing the ICA threw him under the bus, Molly Hemingway says, explaining his decision to ignore the concerns of the career intel experts, he said, quote, I came to the conclusion that the two officers had not read all the available intelligence. That's why he kept the Steele dossier in. He further claimed that he had personal knowledge of raw intelligence that the Russia experts had not seen. Brennan has never publicly shared what his secret knowledge was. Brennan tightly restricted access to the information. The CIA review of the ICA questioned, quote whether the extreme limitations on access to underlying intelligence within the IC during the ICA's preparation was justifiable? What does that mean? But that was the That was Radcliffe's CIA assessment of this. In other words, why are you doing this like we like You've limited access to such a degree that nobody can see it. Whatever this special information, super secret knowledge is, whatever it is, you won't let anybody see it. And you're asking everybody then to make an assessment based on this information, which you won't explain, you won't cite. She goes on to say, given the following that. Following its release, the highest classified version of the ICA was shopped around to literally hundreds of US officials. Furthermore, even those who viewed the secret information strenuously debated whether it meant that Putin aspired to help Trump or not. The New York Times in April of twenty seventeen, so this is after the ICA is out, revealed that Brennan began shopping this claim that Russia supported Trump. Began shopping this in private briefings to numerous members of Congress during August and September. See he was trying he was trying to rig the election. He was trying to prevent Trump from winning. When Brennan briefed then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on this claim, McConnell, according to Brennan, responded, quote which translates to one might say that the CIA and the Obama administration are making such claims in order to prevent Donald Trump from getting elected president. So he was wary. McConnell was like this, Yeah, this doesn't sound right. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid terrible person. By contrast, he worked with Brennan on the contours of a public letter about the Russia collusion hoax, so Harry Reid was gamed to spread this around. Media knew about this. That's what Trump was referencing in that audio clip at the beginning of the hour where he was like, Oh, the New York Times didn't run the Stele dossier stuff. Because the media had the Steele dossier, they couldn't confirm any of it, so they couldn't run it and they couldn't confirm any of it because it was all a lie. And Brennan was pushing this out there as opposition research, which is what it was literally funded by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Like that's the contours of this. Now, why did Brennan get tasked with leading the revision of the ICA? The rewrite by Obama as per Obama's request? Seems pretty clear Obama wanted this in the ICA. All right, that'll do it for this episode. Thank you so much for listening. I could not do the show without your support and the support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast, So if you'd like, please support them too and tell them you heard it here. You can also become a patron at my Patreon page or go to thepetecleanershow dot com again, thank you so much for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.