Some manifestos WILL be released by the FBI, apparently (09-23-2024--Hour3)

[00:00:04] [SPEAKER_02]: What's going on? Thank you so much for listening to this podcast.

[00:00:08] [SPEAKER_02]: It is her live every day from noon to three on WBT radio in Charlotte, and if you want exclusive content

[00:00:14] [SPEAKER_02]: like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, ideally show prep with all the links.

[00:00:18] [SPEAKER_02]: Become a patron, go to thepeekcalinershow.com, make sure you hit the subscribe button

[00:00:23] [SPEAKER_02]: get every episode for free, write your smartphone or tablet.

[00:00:26] [SPEAKER_02]: And again, thank you so much for your support.

[00:00:29] [SPEAKER_02]: Just started the top of the hour newscast there that the would be assassin of Donald Trump, the second one.

[00:00:38] [SPEAKER_02]: He was ordered held without bond.

[00:00:41] [SPEAKER_02]: So, because I guess it's Florida, and they actually keep people in jail down there.

[00:00:49] [SPEAKER_02]: And then there's this in the New York Times, a 58-year-old man accused of trying to assassinate former President Donald Trump acknowledged

[00:00:57] [SPEAKER_02]: in a pre-written note that he had planned the attack and even predicted his failure.

[00:01:08] [SPEAKER_02]: The man, Ryan Routh, staked out the grounds of Mr. Trump's golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida for a month before the episode.

[00:01:19] [SPEAKER_02]: I did read the filing or part of the filing.

[00:01:23] [SPEAKER_02]: And he had two different cell phones in his vehicle when he was apprehended.

[00:01:28] [SPEAKER_02]: And when they did the geolocation, the pings or whatever from the cell phones, they found because they're two different cell phones, two different providers.

[00:01:40] [SPEAKER_02]: And they were both, they were both pinging in the vicinity.

[00:01:45] [SPEAKER_02]: So he apparently left from Greensboro drove down to Florida and hung out around that golf course for a month for a month.

[00:01:59] [SPEAKER_02]: So, not that he camped out like outside the chainlink fence.

[00:02:02] [SPEAKER_02]: But he was constantly going there driving around it, hanging out there, right, stalking.

[00:02:10] [SPEAKER_02]: He was trying to lay in wait for his target.

[00:02:15] [SPEAKER_02]: And this then seems to address the question of how did he know Trump was going to be there at that time?

[00:02:21] [SPEAKER_02]: Well, it appears he did not.

[00:02:24] [SPEAKER_02]: Right, it appears that he just kept going and going and going and going and going and then eventually they crossed paths.

[00:02:36] [SPEAKER_02]: At the time he was seen.

[00:02:38] [SPEAKER_02]: He had this is the New York Times had aligned himself directly to the sixth hole with the intention of shooting Mr. Trump a relatively short distance with a semi automatic rifle, which by the way, I saw the photo of this thing in the filing.

[00:02:50] [SPEAKER_02]: And this thing was rigged up.

[00:02:56] [SPEAKER_02]: And I don't mean that like in an impressive way.

[00:03:02] [SPEAKER_02]: He had soldered on a scope, he had duct tape on it, he had some kind of padding, like some cotton ball padding or something around the eye hole.

[00:03:13] [SPEAKER_02]: I don't even know what he was doing. Like I'm amazed.

[00:03:18] [SPEAKER_02]: I would be amazed if that thing could even fire, but whatever, he had one in the chamber.

[00:03:28] [SPEAKER_02]: quote, this was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, but I failed you as what he said in the note, I tried my best and gave it all the gumption I could muster.

[00:03:38] [SPEAKER_02]: Really?

[00:03:43] [SPEAKER_02]: Like that's, that's because you're from North Carolina, you got a throwing gumption.

[00:03:47] [SPEAKER_02]: All the gumption I could muster. I don't even, does anybody even still use that word?

[00:03:53] [SPEAKER_02]: So he left this note in a box at a friend's house and then he calls on other people to finish the job and puts out a bounty.

[00:04:06] [SPEAKER_02]: And the FBI released this. So there are some manifestos, I guess, that we can publish my God forbid your like the victim of a trans kid at a Christian school in Tennessee.

[00:04:20] [SPEAKER_02]: No, sorry, that manifesto, that does not get released. This one with a bounty calling for somebody else to take another shot at the president or former president, right? That one, everybody gets to see.

[00:04:32] [SPEAKER_02]: Is it any wonder why people have no trust?

[00:04:37] [SPEAKER_02]: In these agencies. In the note, Ralph also wrote that Trump was unfit to be president. He had left the note at the house several months before the shooting.

[00:04:50] [SPEAKER_02]: That's an indication that he had been planning the assassination for a long time. Well, yes, I would think so. When you leave a note like, hey, I'm going to kill somebody and I probably will fail.

[00:05:01] [SPEAKER_02]: And you leave it at someone's house months before you, you know, get caught with a gun at the golf course and then flee.

[00:05:10] [SPEAKER_02]: Secret service after they squeeze off some rounds in your direction.

[00:05:15] [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I'm thinking I'm just connecting the dots here people. I'm thinking yeah, he'd been planning it for a while.

[00:05:22] [SPEAKER_02]: And I'm kind of curious as to why the, I mean, like I have some questions for the friends here.

[00:05:28] [SPEAKER_02]: Like did you know he had this box there or did you open the box only after all of the news broke and then you found the note and you're like, oh my gosh, we got to turn this over is that how that happened?

[00:05:37] [SPEAKER_02]: Or did he just was he like, hey, here's a box if anything ever happens to me, then open it, you know, was it like that or maybe he didn't even tell them about the note in the box or something.

[00:05:47] [SPEAKER_02]: I just find that weird that you would write a note, leave it in a box at a friend's house and never tell them.

[00:05:54] [SPEAKER_02]: Unless the expectation was they would find it after you get shot and killed.

[00:05:58] [SPEAKER_02]: But also the guy seems crazy. So I'm trying to apply like some rational standard to this act, so that's that's probably not wise.

[00:06:07] [SPEAKER_02]: Meanwhile, a study by the Napoliton, the Napoliton Institute, which I believe is equally segregated.

[00:06:19] [SPEAKER_02]: Between the Nila Strawberry and Chocolate. They put out a study based on polling.

[00:06:27] [SPEAKER_02]: The desensitization of some Americans following the second assassination attempt to form a president Trump is alarming.

[00:06:35] [SPEAKER_02]: 17% of voters believe America would have been better off if former president Trump had been killed.

[00:06:41] [SPEAKER_02]: 17% that figure includes 28% of Democrats.

[00:06:49] [SPEAKER_02]: So almost a third of Democrats say America would have been better off if the assassination attempts were successful.

[00:06:58] [SPEAKER_02]: So that's 28%. Then there's another 24% of Democrats who are not sure, who are not sure.

[00:07:10] [SPEAKER_02]: So as one who has never voted for Donald Trump, allow me to tell you, America would not be better off.

[00:07:19] [SPEAKER_02]: Okay, the day after that successful assassination would be awful. And then the months and years following would be awful.

[00:07:32] [SPEAKER_02]: Any assassination of a political leader would be awful.

[00:07:38] [SPEAKER_02]: The fact that you don't know this is highly disturbing to me.

[00:07:42] [SPEAKER_02]: And so I almost suspect, okay, it's not even almost. I do suspect that the 24% of Democrats who are not sure they are also probably of the mind that, yeah,

[00:07:54] [SPEAKER_02]: I could see how America would be better off. They just don't feel comfortable saying that because they still have the remnants of a conscience, you know,

[00:08:01] [SPEAKER_02]: that's telling them a little voice inside their head is like, yeah, you probably shouldn't be saying that. That sounds wrong.

[00:08:12] [SPEAKER_02]: And so that would put the number at more than half of Democrats who either say yes, it would be better off or it's possible.

[00:08:23] [SPEAKER_02]: Fewer than half of Democrats, 48%, could bring themselves to say that America would not be better off if the opposing parties candid it had been killed.

[00:08:36] [SPEAKER_02]: Scott Rasmus in the president of RMG research said,

[00:08:38] [SPEAKER_02]: it's hard to imagine a greater threat to democracy than expressing a desire to have your political opponent murdered.

[00:08:47] [SPEAKER_02]: He is exactly right. He's exactly right. The people who screamed the loudest in defense of the democracy seem to have no problem eliminating your choices, even if it means murder,

[00:09:01] [SPEAKER_02]: which is very stovia-like, by the way. They held elections in the Soviet Union.

[00:09:08] [SPEAKER_02]: I mean, you got to vote, but there was only one person ever on that ballot and then they would always get like 100% of the vote. It was amazing. Such a popular campaign.

[00:09:18] [SPEAKER_02]: Despite two attempts and two months, just over half of all Democrats don't see a need to increase Trump's security detail either, 51%,

[00:09:25] [SPEAKER_02]: no need, no need to increase the security. Among all voters, 62% think Trump's security should be increased, 32% disagree.

[00:09:36] [SPEAKER_02]: 49% of Democrats think it's at least somewhat likely that Trump himself or the campaign was involved in the attempt.

[00:09:43] [SPEAKER_02]: 49% so with the margin of error, that's half. Half Democrats think that he did it to himself, which isn't surprising because they thought that he

[00:09:53] [SPEAKER_02]: was involved in the first attempt on his own life. 21% of Democrats say it's very likely that he was involved or his campaign was involved.

[00:10:03] [SPEAKER_02]: 52% of Republicans think it is at least somewhat likely that the Democrat party or the Harris campaign was involved. This is not healthy people.

[00:10:12] [SPEAKER_02]: You know, stories are powerful. They help us make sense of things to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the people of our past while transcending generations.

[00:10:22] [SPEAKER_02]: They help us process the meaning of life and art stories are told through images and videos.

[00:10:27] [SPEAKER_02]: Preserve your stories with creative video started in 1997 in Maintain Hill, North Carolina.

[00:10:33] [SPEAKER_02]: It was the first company to provide this valuable service converting images, photos and videos into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums.

[00:10:41] [SPEAKER_02]: The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will go over all of the details with you to create a perfect project satisfaction guaranteed.

[00:10:50] [SPEAKER_02]: Drop them off in person or mail them they'll be ready in a week or two. Memorial videos for your loved ones.

[00:10:54] [SPEAKER_02]: Videos for rehearsal dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays or just your family stories all told through images. That's what your photos and videos are they are your life told through the eyes of everyone around you and all who came before you and they will tell others to come who you are visit creativevideo.com.

[00:11:17] [SPEAKER_02]: Hello Dean welcome to the show.

[00:11:18] [SPEAKER_02]: Hi Pete. Hello.

[00:11:20] [SPEAKER_03]: Hey I was listening to about this poll and everything and I just have a question like how are we supposed to know what is the reliable poll or unreliable poll or how are they funded?

[00:11:32] [SPEAKER_03]: Are they for profit or are they your grants or why do they what is they so numerous.

[00:11:40] [SPEAKER_02]: Why are we why are what's so numerous?

[00:11:43] [SPEAKER_03]: These polls and surveys like you said about what you are just told me. I mean how do we know if they're reliable or not or what's the criteria that you use?

[00:11:57] [SPEAKER_03]: I mean are they funded by as a for profit or are they you get a grant to a survey?

[00:12:04] [SPEAKER_03]: I mean it just seems like anything.

[00:12:07] [SPEAKER_02]: What do you think the process works?

[00:12:12] [SPEAKER_03]: Well I don't know because I work reliable polling places do a poll on 10 people and I'm thinking about how representative cadet be and that I hear this kind of thing and I wonder is it was it.

[00:12:29] [SPEAKER_03]: An honest told or is it politically motivated or those people that are doing it or they paid or they funded or you know are they for profit?

[00:12:39] [SPEAKER_02]: Would it be better if would it be better if it was a nonprofit?

[00:12:45] [SPEAKER_03]: Well I would just say wouldn't it be more likely they wouldn't have an agenda I guess if they were really.

[00:12:51] [SPEAKER_02]: Why do you think that why do you think a nonprofit wouldn't have an agenda?

[00:12:59] [SPEAKER_03]: No they could.

[00:13:00] [SPEAKER_03]: I just was I was just quoting the odds I guess between you know the.

[00:13:09] [SPEAKER_03]: It would be more more than likely to put something out there that would generate more profits.

[00:13:17] [SPEAKER_03]: So I you know no but what do you think nonprofits survive do they get profits?

[00:13:24] [SPEAKER_03]: I don't know.

[00:13:26] [SPEAKER_02]: Right and so if I were a nonprofit and I wanted to increase my donations from a certain customer base put an eye also put out polling that would be I just tainted.

[00:13:41] [SPEAKER_02]: Right.

[00:13:43] [SPEAKER_02]: I want to see deep like a year yeah because I can keep asking you all these questions too so I'm curious like what exactly is your assertion.

[00:13:59] [SPEAKER_02]: I'm sorry.

[00:14:01] [SPEAKER_02]: What is your assertion?

[00:14:05] [SPEAKER_03]: I wasn't really trying to take a.

[00:14:08] [SPEAKER_03]: I was trying to figure out you know which ones I should give some.

[00:14:13] [SPEAKER_03]: Queens tour or you know is there is there a criteria is there.

[00:14:19] [SPEAKER_03]: You know way of judging I mean it's like say the survey that you just did.

[00:14:24] [SPEAKER_03]: I just got that is I never heard of the organization before is that.

[00:14:30] [SPEAKER_03]: You know you said they were strawberry vanilla and chocolate.

[00:14:32] [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah the Nepal it's a new service survey of 1000 registered voters conducted online by Scott Rasmussen between September 16th and 17th field work for the survey was conducted by our MG research incorporated which is Scott Rasmussen's polling firm.

[00:14:51] [SPEAKER_03]: Okay.

[00:14:52] [SPEAKER_02]: You know,

[00:14:53] [SPEAKER_02]: Scott Rasmussen reports he's done polling for you know 30 40 years Scott Rasmussen work for a lot of Republicans so yeah you can go and search it and find whether or not Scott Rasmussen is believable to you.

[00:15:07] [SPEAKER_02]: And then you can pull if you want to pull the cross tabs on the survey you can find the cross tabs and find out exactly what was asked and who they asked but I tend to trust Scott Rasmussen and the so him doing the survey.

[00:15:21] [SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to follow to new service that's who paid him.

[00:15:25] [SPEAKER_02]: Alright how about a season approaches and here's an idea give a gift that makes a difference with simply NC goods you directly support North Carolina's local artisans while gifting something truly unique simply NC goods it's a curated box service owned by two lifelong North Carolinians the boxes bring the best of North Carolina directly to your doorstep.

[00:15:46] [SPEAKER_02]: The boxes from simply NC goods feature handpicked treasures from across the state think artisinal foods handcrafted beverages unique home decor skin care items pretty much anything and see every item shares a piece of North Carolina's heart and you'll discover new businesses in every box there are boxes of various sizes and prices so it's super easy to find the perfect gift for anyone and any occasion.

[00:16:10] [SPEAKER_02]: The special holiday themed boxes are available for order now until October 15 so time is running out these boxes make great gifts for friends family even yourself don't miss out on spreading the joy with gifts that support North Carolina based small businesses just visit simply NC goods dot com slash Pete and check them out that simply NC goods dot com slash Pete and thanks for being a part of simply NC good story.

[00:16:38] [SPEAKER_02]: By the way, regarding the polling that I was talking about there about so many democrats that said that America would be better off if the assassination attempts had been successful against Donald Trump.

[00:16:52] [SPEAKER_02]: If this is what the GOP is up against right.

[00:17:00] [SPEAKER_02]: The view by what do you want to call it a quarter a third a half of democrats that think yeah it's okay to whack your political opponent.

[00:17:12] [SPEAKER_02]: Um.

[00:17:15] [SPEAKER_02]: DuPorn site comments matter right in the grand scheme of things if this is the fight see if you believe the left wants you dead then.

[00:17:27] [SPEAKER_02]: You're willing to overlook a lot in order to keep your ranks full of fighters right it's the same in the culture war right you're willing to look past.

[00:17:37] [SPEAKER_02]: The transgressions of members of your own team because you need as many bodies to throw at the front lines is possible.

[00:17:47] [SPEAKER_02]: So people people overlook and they ignore and they forgive the transgressions from their own side in these battles.

[00:17:56] [SPEAKER_02]: Because we don't see ourselves apparently as united as Americans.

[00:18:00] [SPEAKER_02]: We see ourselves first by these jerseys as Keith Larsson used to say.

[00:18:08] [SPEAKER_02]: Moments after an assassin was caught after the secret service thwarted his attempt on Trump's life.

[00:18:16] [SPEAKER_02]: David Strahmat hot air says the left picked up right where they left to off even ramping up the rhetoric.

[00:18:21] [SPEAKER_02]: Now I can't read minds, but they sure seem disappointed that Trump wasn't taken out or to use representative Dan Goldman's own words eliminated.

[00:18:29] [SPEAKER_02]: I play that clip the other day too.

[00:18:33] [SPEAKER_02]: There are tons of examples of liberals bemoaning the fact that Trump keeps getting shot at.

[00:18:37] [SPEAKER_02]: Not because they worry about the possibility that he could get hit.

[00:18:41] [SPEAKER_02]: But because they worry that the people who are taken the shot may not achieve their goals.

[00:18:48] [SPEAKER_02]: This stuff is all over social media.

[00:18:52] [SPEAKER_02]: If only Trump were dead he would no longer be a danger to the democracy right.

[00:18:59] [SPEAKER_02]: Let me play for you a clip this was Peter Doosie from Fox News at one of the White House daily briefings with Karinja.

[00:19:06] [SPEAKER_02]: Trump.

[00:19:08] [SPEAKER_01]: It's been only two days since somebody allegedly tried to kill Donald Trump again.

[00:19:16] [SPEAKER_01]: And you're here at the podium in the White House briefing room calling him a threat.

[00:19:21] [SPEAKER_01]: How many more assassination attempts on Donald Trump until the president and the vice president and you,

[00:19:26] [SPEAKER_01]: pick a different word to describe Trump other than threat?

[00:19:32] [SPEAKER_00]: Peter, if anything from this administration,

[00:19:36] [SPEAKER_00]: I actually completely disagree with the premise of your question.

[00:19:42] [SPEAKER_00]: The question that you're asking, it is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you're asking it.

[00:19:49] [SPEAKER_02]: Darvo, reverse victim offender.

[00:19:53] [SPEAKER_02]: First is deny that is anger, that is reverse victim offender.

[00:19:59] [SPEAKER_02]: That's what she just did.

[00:20:02] [SPEAKER_02]: He's asking her, you're using these terms like threat.

[00:20:10] [SPEAKER_02]: And when will you stop doing that?

[00:20:14] [SPEAKER_02]: And her response is to say, you asking me that is dangerous.

[00:20:19] [SPEAKER_02]: That's the real danger.

[00:20:21] [SPEAKER_02]: You asking me that question. That's the danger.

[00:20:25] [SPEAKER_02]: That's not the danger.

[00:20:29] [SPEAKER_02]: She also said she disagreed with the premise, but she never stated what his premise was.

[00:20:33] [SPEAKER_02]: What was the premise with what your disagreeing? She doesn't say.

[00:20:37] [SPEAKER_00]: Because American people are watching and to say that,

[00:20:41] [SPEAKER_00]: to say that from a administration who has consistently condemned political violence,

[00:20:48] [SPEAKER_00]: from an administration where the president called the former president,

[00:20:52] [SPEAKER_00]: and was thankful, grateful that he was okay.

[00:20:56] [SPEAKER_00]: From an administration who has called out January 6,

[00:20:59] [SPEAKER_00]: called out the attack of Paul Pelosi, called out and said we need to lower the temperature

[00:21:06] [SPEAKER_00]: after the Butler incident.

[00:21:09] [SPEAKER_00]: And now for you to make that kind of comment in your question,

[00:21:17] [SPEAKER_00]: because your question involved the comment in a statement.

[00:21:22] [SPEAKER_00]: And you know, it is, that is also incredibly dangerous.

[00:21:27] [SPEAKER_00]: When we have been very clear in condemning political violence from here.

[00:21:32] [SPEAKER_02]: Except that speech in Philadelphia with the red backdrop and there,

[00:21:36] [SPEAKER_02]: ah, you know, that thing probably, yeah, aside from that.

[00:21:40] [SPEAKER_02]: And right, the constant drum beat. Oh, and then when he said he would take him out back

[00:21:44] [SPEAKER_02]: and beat him up, remember that one too?

[00:21:50] [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I'm not buying it. She had no answer by the way.

[00:21:54] [SPEAKER_02]: This is what it sounds like when a professional but not very adept,

[00:22:00] [SPEAKER_02]: comms hack attempts to not answer a question.

[00:22:05] [SPEAKER_02]: Completely thrown for loop on this. She is not because I guarantee you,

[00:22:08] [SPEAKER_02]: an answer to that question wasn't in her binder of answers.

[00:22:14] [SPEAKER_02]: She has the answer key up there, by the way.

[00:22:16] [SPEAKER_02]: Like that's what she's always looking at when she's always looking down and turning pages

[00:22:20] [SPEAKER_02]: and stuff. The press core mocks are for this.

[00:22:23] [SPEAKER_02]: People in, they all know that she's not very good at her job.

[00:22:27] [SPEAKER_02]: I covered this too where they tried to,

[00:22:31] [SPEAKER_02]: some people in the administration tried to get rid of her because she's not good at her job,

[00:22:34] [SPEAKER_02]: but she's not going anywhere. She refuses to take a job.

[00:22:37] [SPEAKER_02]: They tried to line her up with a gig. I think I forget where.

[00:22:41] [SPEAKER_02]: She either came from Planned Parenthood or they tried to line her up with one of, I forget.

[00:22:44] [SPEAKER_02]: But they tried to line up another gig to get her to step aside and let Kirby take over.

[00:22:51] [SPEAKER_02]: And she was like, no, she's not going anywhere. She's going down with this ship.

[00:22:55] [SPEAKER_02]: So, she's not good.

[00:22:58] [SPEAKER_02]: And there's no answer in her little binder for what he asked her.

[00:23:01] [SPEAKER_02]: And that's why it sounded so bad. Oh, and also because she's very bad at her job.

[00:23:06] [SPEAKER_02]: So when I was a kid my grandpa died with Alzheimer's and before he died my mom and my dad,

[00:23:11] [SPEAKER_02]: and all of us really helped take care of him as he got progressively worse.

[00:23:15] [SPEAKER_02]: 40 years ago there were no treatments and not much support for caregivers and family.

[00:23:20] [SPEAKER_02]: Things are different today because of the work of so many people, including the Alzheimer's Association of Western North Carolina.

[00:23:26] [SPEAKER_02]: It's a great organization with awesome people. They've got huge hearts. I've been a supporter for like 25 years.

[00:23:32] [SPEAKER_02]: This cause means a lot to me. I participate in the annual walk to End Alzheimer's and I am leading a Charlotte team this year.

[00:23:41] [SPEAKER_02]: You can sign up and join the team and walk with me. It's on October 19th at Trouest Field in Uptown. Sign up at alz.org-walk and then just look for my team,

[00:23:52] [SPEAKER_02]: Pete's Pack and there's also a link in the podcast description here. Also I'm going to be MCing the Gastonia Walk on October 5th.

[00:23:59] [SPEAKER_02]: So make a team and join us or make a donation to help me hit my goal. I would really appreciate it. There are a bunch of other walks around the Carolinas

[00:24:07] [SPEAKER_02]: and you can go to alz.org for all of the dates and locations. We are closer than ever to stopping Alzheimer's

[00:24:15] [SPEAKER_02]: And if you can help us get there, we would really appreciate it. Will you come walk with me for a different future for families, for more time, for treatments? This is why I walk.

[00:24:26] [SPEAKER_02]: Let's pick up this audio here. Again, this was the response from the White House Press Secretary to Peter Ducey from Fox News who asked

[00:24:33] [SPEAKER_02]: When will you stop using the word threat as in threat to democracy? Sorry, democracy.

[00:24:41] [SPEAKER_00]: What I have said about the president, the former president, about January 6 is facts.

[00:24:49] [SPEAKER_00]: You all have reported. It is fact.

[00:24:53] [SPEAKER_00]: When you have a former president who basically says that the election wasn't the result of the election, we're not a result of the election.

[00:25:07] [SPEAKER_00]: When dozens of more than 60 Republican judges said that it was a free and fair election.

[00:25:16] [SPEAKER_00]: Six more than 60 said it was indeed a free and fair election. You had more than 2,000 people who were told to go to the Capitol.

[00:25:27] [SPEAKER_00]: It was one of the darkest days of our democracy, one of the darkest days.

[00:25:31] [SPEAKER_02]: Do you notice that she says everything twice?

[00:25:36] [SPEAKER_02]: That's the darkest days. This is the darkest days.

[00:25:40] [SPEAKER_02]: She may say it a third time here too. I don't remember, but

[00:25:44] [SPEAKER_02]: It is obvious tap dancing, rhetorical tap dancing. She does not know how to formulate a convincing persuasive argument.

[00:25:54] [SPEAKER_02]: You're talking too long by the way. As a comms flag, you do not need to say this extended answer. You're not debating with Peter Ducey. Why would you think that that's your gig?

[00:26:05] [SPEAKER_02]: That's not your job.

[00:26:07] [SPEAKER_02]: Peter Ducey asked you the question, when will you stop using the word threat?

[00:26:10] [SPEAKER_02]: We believe the word threat is inaccurate.

[00:26:13] [SPEAKER_02]: Turn. Next question. That's how you answer that. Why are you debating Peter Ducey?

[00:26:20] [SPEAKER_02]: You're just making more means of yourself.

[00:26:24] [SPEAKER_00]: There are people who law enforcement officers who died because of what happened at the Capitol.

[00:26:32] [SPEAKER_00]: And they were there because of all the president told them to go there.

[00:26:37] [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, I don't know if that's not a threat in our democracy when it was one of the darkest days.

[00:26:44] [SPEAKER_00]: January 6th. One of the darkest days.

[00:26:48] [SPEAKER_00]: And so we have been very clear from here.

[00:26:50] [SPEAKER_02]: She's always very clear.

[00:26:52] [SPEAKER_00]: We have a disagreement on policies. We can on issues.

[00:26:57] [SPEAKER_00]: That is what we should do. It is important to have those disagreements.

[00:27:01] [SPEAKER_00]: It is welcome to have those disagreements on the economy on healthcare.

[00:27:07] [SPEAKER_02]: On the policy. Okay, I was going to say anything else.

[00:27:09] [SPEAKER_00]: But when you start bring political rhetoric.

[00:27:13] [SPEAKER_00]: Political rhetoric?

[00:27:15] [SPEAKER_00]: That is not okay. And that's what you've heard from us, too. You've heard of differences on policies.

[00:27:22] [SPEAKER_02]: Then you'll spend a bit of time talking about people being weird.

[00:27:26] [SPEAKER_02]: Who is that political rhetoric or is that policies? I'm curious. What is that count as?

[00:27:34] [SPEAKER_01]: But to your point, there are people watching at home who might miss the part where you say, let's lower the temperature and

[00:27:41] [SPEAKER_01]: There are mentally unstable people who are attempting to kill political candidates attempting to kill Donald Trump.

[00:27:49] [SPEAKER_01]: And they are still hearing this White House referred to him as a threat.

[00:27:53] [SPEAKER_00]: Is there no concern that we're taking that? We're using examples.

[00:27:58] [SPEAKER_00]: We're not just saying that just to say it.

[00:28:01] [SPEAKER_00]: January 6, Peter.

[00:28:04] [SPEAKER_00]: January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6,

[00:28:11] [SPEAKER_00]: How many times do you have to say January 6, 2020?

[00:28:14] [SPEAKER_02]: How many times are you going to say it?

[00:28:16] [SPEAKER_02]: The more times you say it, it doesn't, you're not answering the question. He's asking whether or not your language has any impact whatsoever.

[00:28:25] [SPEAKER_02]: And the answer is no, you don't think that your language has any impact because this is one of the things about, you know, dark triad type people, sociopaths and narcissists.

[00:28:36] [SPEAKER_02]: They don't think that their language should be policed in any way like this.

[00:28:41] [SPEAKER_02]: There was one applied to them. It's just you, you're the problem, not them, you're the problem.

[00:28:47] [SPEAKER_02]: When you say stuff that we don't like, that's a threat to democracy.

[00:28:50] [SPEAKER_02]: When you say, hey, everybody go down to Congress peacefully, that means overthrow the government.

[00:28:57] [SPEAKER_02]: So we have to say he's a danger, he's a threat and oh my gosh, he's just like Hitler.

[00:29:02] [SPEAKER_02]: I'm so glad Hitler survived the assassination of them.

[00:29:05] [SPEAKER_02]: It doesn't make any sense. It's not logically consistent.

[00:29:11] [SPEAKER_00]: That is a fact what was reported that happened on that day by some of your colleagues.

[00:29:18] [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, and we have at the same time denounce political violence over and over political rhetoric over and over again, over and over again.

[00:29:31] [SPEAKER_02]: But what is the difference between the political violence?

[00:29:34] [SPEAKER_02]: Like what's up with that? We've denounced political violence.

[00:29:38] [SPEAKER_02]: Like there's this other violence that we're totally fine with, you know, like if you're going to be burning down the courthouse or like surrounding the White House,

[00:29:47] [SPEAKER_02]: burning the church, right, with it to move Malania and family down to the safe location, right?

[00:29:54] [SPEAKER_02]: They had to get people out of there because is that it?

[00:29:57] [SPEAKER_02]: That kind of, is that different? Is that different? Because you're doing it?

[00:30:01] [SPEAKER_02]: Is it different when anti-fadeza?

[00:30:02] [SPEAKER_02]: Or Black Lives Matter? Or the Palestinians?

[00:30:08] [SPEAKER_02]: But just need some guardrails.

[00:30:09] [SPEAKER_00]: You know, your focus has to be on this side in the house. It can't be on your side of the house. I get that.

[00:30:15] [SPEAKER_00]: But we also have to be careful on how you're asking me these questions.

[00:30:19] [SPEAKER_00]: People are watching and is what you were saying.

[00:30:21] [SPEAKER_02]: Now we have to be careful with the way he's asking the question. You got to be careful with the way he speaks, but not the way you speak.

[00:30:29] [SPEAKER_02]: See what she's doing? This is Darvel. This is RVO reverse victim and defender.

[00:30:35] [SPEAKER_00]: About us raising political violent, right? Whatever however you just formulated it,

[00:30:40] [SPEAKER_00]: this is an administration that has denounced and condemned any type of political rhetoric or violence.

[00:30:48] [SPEAKER_02]: You have not condemned political rhetoric. That's stupid. You've engaged in it.

[00:30:54] [SPEAKER_02]: She's flailing. It's pretty sad.

[00:30:56] [SPEAKER_02]: Alright, that'll do it for this episode. Thank you so much for listening. I could not do the show without your support and the support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast.

[00:31:05] [SPEAKER_02]: So if you'd like, please support them too until I'm here. You can also become a patron at my Patreon page or go to dpcalinnershow.com again.

[00:31:14] [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you so much for listening and don't break anything while I'm gone.