American mayor worked for Chi-Coms; US rejects UN migration plan | Hour 2
The Pete Kaliner ShowMay 12, 202600:33:1122.83 MB

American mayor worked for Chi-Coms; US rejects UN migration plan | Hour 2

This episode is presented by Create A Video – The mayor of Arcadia, CA has pleaded guilty to acting as a foreign agent for the Chinese communist government. Plus, the United States rejected the United Nations' "Global Compact on Migration" which the Trump administration said "laid waste to our communities: rime and chaos at the border, states of emergency in major cities, and billions of taxpayer dollars funneled towards hotels, plane tickets, cell phones, and cash cards for migrants."

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-kaliner-show--6946691/support.

Subscribe to the podcast 
My preferred podcast platform: Spreaker
All the links to Pete's Prep are free!

Get exclusive content here!
Media Bias Check: GroundNews promo code!
Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.com

What's going on? Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily show prep with all the links, become a patron, go to vpetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the subscribe button. Get every episode for free, write your smartphone or tablet, and again, thank you so much for your support this story. As reported by ABC News. Eileen Wang not to be confused with Fang Fang. This is Eileen Wang. She is the mayor of Arcadia, California, but very similarly to Fangfang also working for the Commies. Yes, the mayor of an American city has been charged with acting as an illegal foreign agent for China that according to the US Justice Department, Wang agreed to plead guilty. Starting in late twenty twenty, Wang, along with a fella by the name of Yowning Sun, but he goes by Mike. Wang and Sun worked together to operate a website called US News Center that purported to be a news source for the local Chinese American community. The Justice Department said in a plea agreement that Wang and Sun quote received and executed directives from the PRC that would be the People's Republic of China government officials. Yeah, they got directives from PRC government officials to post pro PRC content on the website and sometimes even sought approval from PRC government officials to circulate other pro PRC content. So basically it's kind of like the same as our own, you know, American legacy media. They get the thing sort of treatment. In her plea agreement, she admitted to not notifying the Attorney General that she was in fact working for the CHI cooms. Guys, I think I think we're not taking this thing seriously enough. I don't know. This is a good sign. I want to say this is a good sign, the fact that they were able to ferret this out. Hopefully, with you know, more AI being integrated into government systems and such, hopefully some of this stuff gets flagged a little bit easier. But I don't know. I did see an interesting interview with the guy was talking about AI being used in the Iran war and how just like humans could not sift through all of the data and make the connect actions. Uh, nearly as quickly as as AI does, and that's how they've been able to target you know, hundreds of targets in Iran and why they were able to hit them within the first you know, half hour or whatever it was of the war. So that's the pallenteer targeting AI stuff. So a little bit of good news. We got one chicom I have I have no idea if it's connected to Swallow. Okay, I have no idea. Before you ask, I have no idea. If there's any connection to Swallow, then there is this another piece of good news for all you black pillars out there. The United States did not participate in the International Migration Review Forum and will not support the May eighth, quote Progress Declaration. This from the United States State Department. The They put out a statement saying the US has persistently objected to the United Nations efforts to advocate and facilitate replacement, sorry replacement immigration in the United States and across the broader West. Now, before you start saying, oh. This is some white nationalist thing, no, this is what the UN called it. Their own report called it replacement migration, and they cited declining birth rates in the West as the reason to facilitate replacement migration, and they had a forum on this to do like a progress report, and the US. Is like, count us out. We don't want anything to do with this. In twenty seventeen, President Trump rejected the Global Compact on Migration. The intervening years have confirmed the wisdom of that opposition. As Secretary Rubio said, opening our doors to mass migration was a grave mistake that threatens the cohesion of our societies and the future of our peoples. In recent years, Americans witnessed firsthand how mass immigration laid waste to our communities, crime and chaos at the border, states of emergency in major cities, and billions of taxpayer dollars funneled towards hotels, plane tickets, cell phones, and cash cards for migrants. Much of this was driven by UN agencies and their partners, which did not just facilitate the invasion of our country, but proceeded to redistribute our own people's wealth and resources to millions of foreigners from the worst corners. Of the world. The statement goes on to say there was nothing safe, orderly, or regular about any of this, and the costs were borne primarily by working Americans. Forced to compete for scarce jobs, housing, and social services. The UN has little to say about them. President Trump is focused on the interests of Americans, not foreigners or globalist bureaucrats. The United States will not support a process that imposes overtly or by stealth, guidelines, standards, or commitments that constrain the American people's sovereign, democratic right to make decisions in the best interests of our country. Our goal is not to manage migration, but to foster remigration. You know what I thought of when I read this statement. I mentioned this last week in a complete surprise to anybody paying attention. The what I am more convinced. Of every day, the fed plant of Nick Fouentes. You know, this overt Nazi Lovin Stalin Loven anti Jew, anti black, racist, anti like this guy who leads his gropers and all this, although now his gropers are turning on him. I saw this yesterday, which was quite hilarious because he apparently did not bash the Jews enough when he went on Tucker Carlson Show, and so they were very upset with him about that. Anyway, Fuentes came out and declared himself to be a non woke moderate Democrat. So anybody who has purported to be on the political right and now is telling you to vote for the Democrat instead of any Republican in the midterms. Any Republican that runs for president, we don't even know who that would be at this point, right, I mean, we have some guesses, sure, but there's no nominee. So anybody that's coming out right. Now telling you that you have to burn the whole party down and to do so, that means we have to turn power back over to the Democrats in order to teach the Republicans the lesson or something about Iran, the action in Iran. Right, this is what they are demanding that you ignore, this kind of statement coming out from our government. Think about you've heard of the Overton window, right, which is this political concept of you know, like if you think of things like on a just a horizontal line, and you know you have extremes on either side, and you know, mainstream people would not hold certain positions that are out towards the edges of that line, but the Overton window can shift and inside that window, these are the things that you know mainstream quote unquote mainstream people debate and the positions they take and the disagreements that they have, right that that Overton window can be can be pushed along that horizontal line. So what may once have has started out as a fringe position then becomes more mainstream and able to be discussed. This used to be like, think back, could you imagine Mitt Romney saying something like this, a Romney administration saying something like this. I could not, And maybe in today's day and age he may have. I doubt it. But you know with. Paul Ryan or John McCain or even George W. Bush Right who floated the whole comprehensive immigration reform aka amnesty, do you think he would have done this? Of course not right. This is what the people who are purporting to be on your team but are actually chasing clicks and dollars and their own self aggrandizement. Right, This is what they want you to abandon. They want you to abandon this position and to allow the Overton window to shift back, so you can't talk about this sort of thing now. The Department of State also went onto the Twitter machine and did it's a huge what we used to call a tweet storm. Now they're just called a thread or something whatever. I will tell you what they said on the tweet storm in a moment. You know. Stories are powerful. They help us make sense of things, to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the people of our past while transcending generations. They help us process the meaning of life and our stories are told through images and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video started in nineteen ninety seven and Minhill, North Carolina. It was the first company to provide this valuable service, converting images, photos and videos into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums. The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will go over all of the details with you to create a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person or mail them. They'll be ready in a week or two. Memorial videos for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories all told through images. That that's what your photos and videos are. They are your life told through the eyes of everyone around you and all who came before you, and they will tell others to come who you are. Visit Creative Video dot com all right, So this from the United States State Department on Twitter formerly known as X expanding on their press release that they put out saying that they were not doing anything, not participating, and in fact rejects the Global Compact on Migration. Okay, they go on to say on Twitter, you and agencies systematically facilitated mass migration into America and Europe, even as citizens of these nations called for restrictions on migration. Now, the Global Compact's latest report urges nations to expand migration pathways and pursue regularization of migrants. UN agencies, working with the NGOs that they fund, established a migration corridor through Central America and to the US border. As the American people suffered under an unprecedented wave of mass migration, the UN was on the ground pipelining migrants to our southern border. Okay, I've read enough. Get us out of the UN. This is obviously a hostile force. Like, just kick them out of the building. You can do your globalist crap someplace else. We're done. I am so done with this. You're taking mainly our money, because the US mainly funds the UN, So you're taking our money and you're going to use our money to then pass out pass out funds to these NGOs, these non governmental organizations, who are then going to infiltrate our country, breaking our own laws. And by the way, you can't tell me that the previous administration was unaware of any of this. I knew about the pipeline through the Darien Gap, right, We talked about it. We talked about how NGOs were doing this, Catholic charities. I'm looking in your direction, right, all right, So back to this thing. This is going to give me man. UN officials greeted migrants along the route through the deadly Darien Gap. Un Funded NGOs handed out maps to migrants en route to the US. After facilitating mass migration to the United States, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants. As Europe endured sustained migratory pressure, UN officials staffed all ends of the Mediterranean migration route from the coast of Libya to the shores of the Aegean Sea to the islands of Greece. Then, UN agencies condemned frontline states who refused to open their borders. While the United Kingdom faced unprecedented illegal boat crossings. UN agencies condemned plans for deportations. UN officials lobbied aviation regulators to prevent the deportation of migrants, an appalling violation of the UK's national sovereignty. The Global Compact on Migration claims to support quote safe migration for the citizens of Western nations. Mass migration was never safe. It introduced new security threats, imposed financial strains, and undermined the cohesion of our societies. The United States will not legitimize global compacts that enable mass migration into America or Western nations. Under President Trump, the State Department will facilitate remigration, not replacement migration. And again that term is the term used by the UN, replacement migration. They're not hiding this. They're not hiding it. They're actually talking about using illegal immigration and fostering illegal immigration in order to replace the populations of various countries, notably only Western societies. I wonder why, like this joke of an organization like the UN was never supposed to be a place where like the worst abusers of human rights, our geopolitical enemies like that they would somehow be on equal footing with the free societies. Right, Like this is absurd you want to have a body that has these kinds of deliberations to try to avoid war and the like. Have at it, y'all. Do it someplace else. Just do it someplace else. Also, here's another win. Illegal aliens have chosen to abandon their asylum claims in record numbers since Trump took office. This according to The Washington Post, which of course covers it like, oh my gosh, this is terrible. I look at this as like fantastic cool. They've been held in a detention facility, they can't get their asylum claim hurt, and so they're going to go home, which tells me that they weren't really that afraid of being killed, right. The fact that they were abandoning the asylum claim tells me that the claim wasn't legitimate in the first place, because the reason why you would claim asylum is a very specific list of reasons, and it's you know, death, oppression like that kind of thing. And the fact that you're. Like, yeah, you know what, I'll go back home tells me that your original claim was bunk from the beginning, as like ninety percent of them are. Okay. Legal insurrection dot Com piece by Mary Chastain talking about more than eighty thousand illegal aliens have given up asylum claims during the Trump administration. Data from the Vera Institute of Justice shows that immigration judges issued more than eighty thousand voluntary departure orders from January twenty twenty five through March of this year. These people who. Ask for the voluntary departure order, they cannot have a serious criminal record. Okay, so we're not going to send you home if you've done something illegal. Here a judge hands out those orders when the illegal alien requests to leave on their own instead of a formal deportation order. The According to the Washington Post, the number of people abandoning their immigration cases is at least seven times as high as the number seen in the last fifteen months of the Biden administration, when eleven thousand, four hundred took that option. So under a fifteen month period in the Biden administration, there was eleven four hundred, and in a fifteen month period under Trump, it was eighty thousand. Okay. Remember it was the Biden administration that created this fake asylum process, right They created the CBP one app in order for people to just you know, apply online on an app. And just be like, are you an asyle? Yes, I'm seeking asylum. Click the button Welcome to America. Like that was a bit that was basically it. And then Okay, you have a court date, but it's probably going to be in like six or seven years because we're letting so many people in. This was part of the This was part of the project of the Biden administration under Alejandro Mayorkas, the Department of Homeland Security secretary, who, by the way, was supposed to review all of these cases individually, but he did not do so, in clear violation of the law. But he was never held to account for that. And I'm assuming. He got a pardon by Biden. I mean everybody got pardons from Biden, so I assume he got one. More than seventy percent of those granted a voluntary departure order during Trump's second administration were being held in immigration detention when they made the request, a far higher share than those who deported willingly under Joe Biden. So what does that mean. It means Joe Biden was letting people out of the detention facilities. That's what that means. Right, that people applied for asylum were allowed into the country, and so there was no incentive for them to voluntarily be sent back to abandon their claims, because why would they They got what. They wanted, right. They came in illegally under an asylum quote unquote program, claiming to be some sort of refugee fleeing violence or something, and they were not, so they made false claims to get in, and then why would they seek to be removed. Biden and then Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Majorcus recklessly unleashed millions of unvetted illegal aliens excuse me, illegal aliens. Don't know what that was? Real, professional pete. So this is a quote, by the way, from the interim or I guess he's official. Now. Did Mark Wayne Mullen did he get approved as the new DHS secretary? Anyway? He put out a statement saying that Biden and Mayorcus recklessly unleashed millions of unvetted illegal aliens into American communities, and they abused many loopholes to do so. Trump and Mullen are now enforcing this law as it was actually written to keep America safe. So again, a little bit of good news. I know a lot of people are black pilling these days. But there are wins. There are wins. Next DC police officers on the way out, Why, well, there's about thirteen of them. Actually, there are thirteen of them. You may recall when Trump sent the National Guard to Washington, DC, remember, and Democrats and media, but I repeat myself, they were like screaming bloody murder. They were like, how dare you? Our city is safe? In fact, actually we have the lowest crime. We've ever had. There's zero crime in Washington, DC. You remember all of that, And this was used to say that Trump is a tyrant, he's literally hitler, he's authoritarian. And people looked at the crime stats out of DC, and especially people who live in DC and work in DC. They were thinking, this doesn't seem right, Like we walked. DC all the time, we drive around and all this, and it doesn't feel like it's been the safest it's ever been. And that then prompted some suspicion that maybe the Metro police were, as they say, juicing the stats. And then the union came out and said, oh, yeah, they're juicing the stats. And now turns out's true they were juicing the stats. In August of last year, it was apparent that something hinky was going on with Washington, d C's metropolitan crime stats, especially once they started getting trotted out on a regular basis to rebut Trump's assertions about the safety of the city itself. This is by Bee Wellborn at hot air dot com. The Associated Press was more than happy to debunk quote unquote the bombastic president AP reports quote Washington's crime rate has been getting better all this year. The crime statistics prove it. But then a short time later, a DC commander was suspended for massaging the numbers, and then he named an assistant chief in an equal opportunity case, and the union accused the department of deliberately falsifying crime data. It turns out they had started sniffing around and doing their own gum shoe work. The department quietly settled a lawsuit the day that Trump announced the federal takeover, and the chief who had been accused got promoted. The department's chief, Pamela Smith, has now resigned after Representative James Comer's Congressional committee released its interim report asserting that the books had been cooked. It also ripped into the chief's ten at the helm. This from the Congressional report on the Washington DC stats and the massaging or the juicing of the stats. This wasn't rogue actors. House Oversight Committee reports DOJ findings under US Attorney Janine Piro and whistleblower testimony painted a coercive culture of fear under former Chief Pamela Smith. Commanders alleged pressure from the top to suppress spikes in crime stats post twenty twenty three's historic surge why they feared retaliation. Smith denied it and then resigned amid scrutiny and touted quote sharp reductions. Yet probes reviewed thousands of reports, interviewed dozens of people and found stats artificially lower, and internal affairs investigation by the Metro Police then dropped their bombshell on on Thursday. Their report the Metropolitan Police Department's internal investigators have sustained accusations against at least fifteen high ranking police officials, including captains, commanders, and assistant chiefs, in a sweeping investigation into crime statistics. This according to two sources familiar with the matter. In what has to be a record for fast action, the interim chief announced that the department had begun termination proceedings against thirteen of the individuals named in the internal affairs report. Jeffrey Carroll is the interim chief of the Metropolitan Police Department. He was tight lipped about the details of the investigation itself. Carol did not say how long the crime data manipulation went on, how it happened, or even if the group of thirteen employees were working together. He also did not discuss what motivated them to minimize crime statistics. Yeah, that's a brain buster. What could possibly have motivated the police department to enact an organized, concentrated effort to reduce the crime statistics artificially? Hm, we may never know. City Council, City Council. Before the news conference, Gregory Pemberton, the head of the DC Police Officers Union, said the command staff officials responsible for this betrayal must be held accountable. So this is interesting because this is the police union, and usually the police union defends the police right when something like this happens, they come to the defense of the police officers, But not now. For him, he said, it's important for the sake of the thousands of dedicated MPD officers they undermined, and for the residents of the district who deserve honest leadership and real public safety systemic a systemic pattern of crime stat manipulation under former Chief Pamela Smith, including pressuring patrol commanders to downgrade serious violent and property felonies, for example, assault with a dangerous weapon, robberies, burglaries, motor vehicle thefts. Right, they downgraded all of these things in order to create the false appearance of falling crime rates while actual crime increased. Internal data showed a one point seventy two percent increase in violent crime for the year twenty twenty four. That was in complete contradiction to what the police reported, which was a twenty eight point thirty two percent decrease. Okay, guys, like, first off, if you're going to be juiced in the stats like this and you've got like a two percent increase in crime, maybe just go the other direction by like two points three points. You don't go twenty eight points a twenty eight point reduction in crime. People would notice that if it's just a two or three percent decrease, most people would be like, eh, it's about the same, you know. Also, the chief was accused of creating a toxic culture of coercion, fear, and corruption that left thousands of cases uninvestigated, denied victims justice, and endangered public safety. Yes, that's one of the angles of this story that gets so little coverage, which is if you are the victim of a violent crime and then the police downgrade that charge, that means that you're not going to get the kind of investigation, and you're not going to get the kind of prosecution, and you're not if you even get one, and if you do get one, you're not going to get the kind of sentencing that justice would otherwise require. Right, so you're being revicti demised by the police because of this effort. James Comer, the Oversight Committee chair, is still waiting in the wings for the Internal Affairs audit results to reach his committee, but according to reports, he has been in contact the entire time, so there will be a federal shoe yet to drop. Again, a very good start next trying to clear out some of these stories that have been accumulating. A Utah judge ruled that on Friday, cameras, microphones, and still photographers will be allowed inside the courtroom for the murder trial of Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. Fourth District Court Judge Tony Graff denied a request from the defense to ban all forms of electronic media coverage, instead requiring reporters to file requests at least two weeks prior to each scheduled proceeding. And by the way, I support this, especially because Utah already allows cameras in the courtrooms, so to go back on that for this trial not good. But also I think there are a lot of people that need to actually monitor the court proceeding and maybe become disabused of their dumb assery. Robinson has been charged with the September tenth, twenty twenty five killing could face the death penalty if convicted. The defense had argued that if you let cameras into the courtroom, well, that will jeopardize Robinson's fair trial rights, telling the judge that restrictions are necessary to ensure that his rights to due process, a fair and impartial jury. There's the right to counsel, is right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. I mean, the only one there that well too, maybe would be right to do process and fair and impartial jury, right, because like maybe the tainting of the jury pool maybe, but like the jury is selected pretty early on. So I kind of suspect that if you're going to have a tainted jury pool, it's going to be tainted in both directions. Seriously, like the. Amount of damage done by people like Candae Owens that have been floating out these crazy conspiracy theories, which, by the way, has she figured out who killed Charlie Kirk yet? I'm just wondering because it's been a while, right, We're approaching one year, and she keeps saying she has all of this evidence and it's going to prove the case, and then she strings people along and does another tease watch my next episode. We're totally going to crack the case. And then she hasn't been able to crack the case. It's almost as if she does not have the investigative experience or expertise necessary to actually crack the case, especially when compared to I don't know, actual investigators who collected the evidence and such and are going to present it in a court of law with evidentiary rules, you know that kind of thing. I mean, it's almost like that. But the defense argued media coverage had already tainted the jury pool, pointing to several examples of pundits branding Robinson as a monster and fixating on items pulled from court filings, like the post shooting texts to his transgender roommate, rather than the substance of the proceedings. The prosecution dismissed that argument, saying transparency strengthens public trust, and that is true. That is true. All right, that'll do it for this episode. Thank you so much for listening. I could not do the show without your support and the support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like, please support them too and tell them you heard it here. You can also become a patron at my Patreon page or go to thepetecallanershow dot com. Again, thank you so much for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.